Impact of Assessment of Empirical Studies Reliability: A Revisited Study

D. Carrizo, J. Manriquez
{"title":"Impact of Assessment of Empirical Studies Reliability: A Revisited Study","authors":"D. Carrizo, J. Manriquez","doi":"10.1109/SCCC.2018.8705250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical studies are one of the main inputs of Evidence Based Software Engineering to generate a body of knowledge. For this reason, it is relevant to know the reliability of the results obtained by applying empirical methods before the aggregation of evidence. In a previous paper, results of empirical studies were added to confirm the influence of contextual attributes without evaluating their reliability. This article reviews that previous work but considering in the addition of results its reliability. For this reazon, an evaluation method, created by the authors was used to assess the mitigation of threats to validity of empirical studies. The results of this study show that when considering the reliability of empirical studies, the previous results vary significantly. This impact validation of evaluation method can help to be adopted and improved in empirical software engineering research.","PeriodicalId":235495,"journal":{"name":"2018 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","volume":"26 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC.2018.8705250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Empirical studies are one of the main inputs of Evidence Based Software Engineering to generate a body of knowledge. For this reason, it is relevant to know the reliability of the results obtained by applying empirical methods before the aggregation of evidence. In a previous paper, results of empirical studies were added to confirm the influence of contextual attributes without evaluating their reliability. This article reviews that previous work but considering in the addition of results its reliability. For this reazon, an evaluation method, created by the authors was used to assess the mitigation of threats to validity of empirical studies. The results of this study show that when considering the reliability of empirical studies, the previous results vary significantly. This impact validation of evaluation method can help to be adopted and improved in empirical software engineering research.
实证研究信度评估的影响:再访研究
实证研究是基于证据的软件工程产生知识体系的主要输入之一。因此,在收集证据之前,了解应用经验方法得到的结果的可靠性是有意义的。在之前的一篇论文中,加入了实证研究的结果来证实上下文属性的影响,但没有评估其可靠性。本文回顾了前人的工作,并考虑了其可靠性。为此,使用了作者创建的一种评估方法来评估减轻对实证研究有效性的威胁。本研究结果表明,在考虑实证研究的可靠性时,前人的研究结果差异显著。这种影响验证评价方法有助于在实证软件工程研究中被采用和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信