Symbolic and systemic violence in media representations of aggression towards ambulance personnel in the Netherlands

Nicole Cuijpers, P. Brown
{"title":"Symbolic and systemic violence in media representations of aggression towards ambulance personnel in the Netherlands","authors":"Nicole Cuijpers, P. Brown","doi":"10.3402/shv.v7.28669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violence towards public sector employees is perceived as a growing problem in a number of societies, attracting the attention of mass media, politicians and social scientists alike. In this article we discuss how national newspapers have reported aggression towards ambulance workers in the Netherlands. Our analysis is informed by Žižek's conceptualisations of less visible yet fundamental formats of violence, which he posits as vital for analysing narratives of subjective experiences of aggression. Based on quantitative analysis of newspaper articles describing such incidents between 2000 and 2010, we first provide insight into trends in media coverage. Following this, 121 news stories referring to the six most reported incidents are analysed using a critical discourse framework, paying particular attention to discursive constructs by which certain hegemonic explanations of the events were created and reinforced. Our findings denote a dramatic increase in reporting in the latter half of the decade, with large spikes of media interest around the key incidents. Analysis of central themes in the reporting of these key incidents, especially in terms of explanations and attributions of blame, notes the disproportionate influence of professionals’ narratives, in contrast to those of often-marginalised individuals and groups who were depicted as the perpetrators of violence. This inequality in power is analysed as leading to particular (mis)representations of incidents and the related reproduction of stigmatising and othering discourses within newspaper coverage. Such tendencies in reporting came to centre upon discourses of ethnicity towards the latter part of the decade, reflecting more general tendencies within the Dutch public sphere at this time. We then apply our Žižekian framework to illuminate how subjective narratives of violence are embedded within the reproduction of symbolic and systemic violence. Such understandings of violence have vital implications for policy interventions.","PeriodicalId":254363,"journal":{"name":"Society, Health & Vulnerability","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society, Health & Vulnerability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/shv.v7.28669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Violence towards public sector employees is perceived as a growing problem in a number of societies, attracting the attention of mass media, politicians and social scientists alike. In this article we discuss how national newspapers have reported aggression towards ambulance workers in the Netherlands. Our analysis is informed by Žižek's conceptualisations of less visible yet fundamental formats of violence, which he posits as vital for analysing narratives of subjective experiences of aggression. Based on quantitative analysis of newspaper articles describing such incidents between 2000 and 2010, we first provide insight into trends in media coverage. Following this, 121 news stories referring to the six most reported incidents are analysed using a critical discourse framework, paying particular attention to discursive constructs by which certain hegemonic explanations of the events were created and reinforced. Our findings denote a dramatic increase in reporting in the latter half of the decade, with large spikes of media interest around the key incidents. Analysis of central themes in the reporting of these key incidents, especially in terms of explanations and attributions of blame, notes the disproportionate influence of professionals’ narratives, in contrast to those of often-marginalised individuals and groups who were depicted as the perpetrators of violence. This inequality in power is analysed as leading to particular (mis)representations of incidents and the related reproduction of stigmatising and othering discourses within newspaper coverage. Such tendencies in reporting came to centre upon discourses of ethnicity towards the latter part of the decade, reflecting more general tendencies within the Dutch public sphere at this time. We then apply our Žižekian framework to illuminate how subjective narratives of violence are embedded within the reproduction of symbolic and systemic violence. Such understandings of violence have vital implications for policy interventions.
在荷兰,媒体对救护人员侵略的象征性和系统性暴力
在一些社会中,对公共部门雇员的暴力行为被认为是一个日益严重的问题,引起了大众传媒、政治家和社会科学家的注意。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了国家报纸如何报道对荷兰救护工作者的侵略。我们的分析基于Žižek对不太明显但基本的暴力形式的概念化,他认为这对于分析主观侵略经历的叙述至关重要。基于对2000年至2010年间描述此类事件的报纸文章的定量分析,我们首先提供了对媒体报道趋势的洞察。在此之后,使用批判性话语框架分析了涉及六个报道最多的事件的121个新闻故事,特别关注话语结构,通过话语结构,某些霸权解释被创造和加强。我们的研究结果表明,在这十年的后半段,报道的数量急剧增加,媒体对关键事件的兴趣大幅上升。对这些关键事件报告的中心主题,特别是在解释和归咎方面的分析表明,专业人员的叙述与经常被边缘化的个人和群体的叙述形成鲜明对比,这些个人和群体被描述为暴力的肇事者。这种权力上的不平等被分析为导致对事件的特定(错误)表述,以及在报纸报道中对污名化和其他话语的相关复制。这种报道的趋势在十年的后半部分集中在种族话语上,反映了当时荷兰公共领域内更普遍的趋势。然后,我们应用Žižekian框架来阐明暴力的主观叙述如何嵌入到象征性和系统性暴力的再现中。这种对暴力的理解对政策干预具有至关重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信