Rethinking Offa’s Dyke as a Hydraulic Frontier Work

H. Williams
{"title":"Rethinking Offa’s Dyke as a Hydraulic Frontier Work","authors":"H. Williams","doi":"10.23914/odj.v5i0.7733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building upon a fresh interpretation of Wat’s Dyke as a component of an early medieval hydraulic frontier zone rather than primarily serving as a symbol of power, a fixed territorial border or a military stop-line (Williams 2021), here, I refine and apply this approach to its longer and better-known neighbour: Offa’s Dyke.  This linear earthwork’s placement, alignments and landscape context are evaluated afresh using a simple but original comparative mapping methodology. First, on the local level, I show that Offa’s Dyke was carefully and strategically positioned to connect, overlook and block a range of watercourses and wetlands at key transverse and parallel crossing points, thus observing and choreographing mobility on multiple axes. Second, I address the regional scale, showing how Offa’s Dyke interacted with, and controlled, biaxial movement through and between water catchments parallel and transverse to the monument’s principal alignments. Both these arguments inform how the Dyke might have operated on the supra-regional scale, ‘from sea to sea’ and also ‘across the sea’, by controlling the estuarine and maritime zones of the Dee Estuary in the north and the Wye/Severn confluence to the south. Integrating military, territorial, socio-economic and ideological functionality and significance, Offa’s Dyke, like its shorter neighbour Wat’s Dyke (in an as-yet uncertain relationship), configured mobilities over land and water via its hydraulic dimensions and interactions. Together, the monuments can be reconsidered as elements of a multi-functional hydraulic frontier zone constructed by one or more rulers of the middle Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia and operative both in times of peace and conflict.","PeriodicalId":321573,"journal":{"name":"Offa's Dyke Journal","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Offa's Dyke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23914/odj.v5i0.7733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building upon a fresh interpretation of Wat’s Dyke as a component of an early medieval hydraulic frontier zone rather than primarily serving as a symbol of power, a fixed territorial border or a military stop-line (Williams 2021), here, I refine and apply this approach to its longer and better-known neighbour: Offa’s Dyke.  This linear earthwork’s placement, alignments and landscape context are evaluated afresh using a simple but original comparative mapping methodology. First, on the local level, I show that Offa’s Dyke was carefully and strategically positioned to connect, overlook and block a range of watercourses and wetlands at key transverse and parallel crossing points, thus observing and choreographing mobility on multiple axes. Second, I address the regional scale, showing how Offa’s Dyke interacted with, and controlled, biaxial movement through and between water catchments parallel and transverse to the monument’s principal alignments. Both these arguments inform how the Dyke might have operated on the supra-regional scale, ‘from sea to sea’ and also ‘across the sea’, by controlling the estuarine and maritime zones of the Dee Estuary in the north and the Wye/Severn confluence to the south. Integrating military, territorial, socio-economic and ideological functionality and significance, Offa’s Dyke, like its shorter neighbour Wat’s Dyke (in an as-yet uncertain relationship), configured mobilities over land and water via its hydraulic dimensions and interactions. Together, the monuments can be reconsidered as elements of a multi-functional hydraulic frontier zone constructed by one or more rulers of the middle Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia and operative both in times of peace and conflict.
奥法堤防作为水利前沿工程的再思考
基于对沃特堤防作为中世纪早期水力边界区的一个组成部分的全新解释,而不是主要作为权力的象征、固定的领土边界或军事分界线(Williams 2021),在这里,我将这种方法改进并应用于它更古老、更知名的邻居:奥法堤防。这种线性土方工程的位置、排列和景观背景使用简单但原始的比较测绘方法进行了重新评估。首先,在地方层面上,我展示了奥法堤防的精心和战略性定位,在关键的横向和平行交叉点连接、俯瞰和阻挡一系列水道和湿地,从而在多个轴上观察和编排流动性。其次,我讨论了区域尺度,展示了奥法堤防是如何与与纪念碑主要路线平行和横向的集水区之间的双轴运动相互作用和控制的。这两种观点都表明,通过控制北部的Dee河口和南部的Wye/Severn汇合处的河口和海洋区域,大堤是如何在超区域范围内运作的,“从海到海”,也“跨越海”。奥法堤防整合了军事、领土、社会经济和意识形态的功能和意义,就像它较矮的邻居沃特堤防(在一种尚未确定的关系中)一样,通过其水力尺寸和相互作用配置了陆地和水的机动性。总之,这些纪念碑可以被重新考虑为一个多功能水力边界区的元素,由中世纪盎格鲁-撒克逊王国麦西亚的一个或多个统治者建造,在和平时期和冲突时期都能运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信