“That I Did Love the Moor to Live with Him”: Islam in/and the Study of “Western Esotericism”

L. Saif
{"title":"“That I Did Love the Moor to Live with Him”: Islam in/and the Study of “Western Esotericism”","authors":"L. Saif","doi":"10.1163/9789004446458_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the field of “Western esotericism” has been confronted by problems related to the cultural and regional demarcations it has adopted. This field is based on a longue durée narrative that underplays non-“Western” currents, including ones which, through appropriation or reactions to them, constitutedmajor sources for it. One of themost immediate arguments against the use of the qualifier “Western” and an essentialized “West” is European entanglements with Islamdom. This article tackles the ambiguous place given to Islam in the narrative of “Western esotericism” and the wider intellectual and historical complex that feeds the exclusionary tendencies expressed by the “Western” in “Western esotericism.” It begins by providing a historical background of the West versus East divide in order to grasp the genealogy of the discourse and locate the problems resulting from an esotericism labelled as “Western.” Two major components of this narrative within which Islam is usually evoked are then highlighted: first, the sanitization of orientalist perspectives, and, second, the reliance on perennialist sources, especially the writings of Henry Corbin. Finally, the article recommends, on one level, a reflective global approach that takes into account the agency of non-Western actors in the globalization of values and concepts in modern and pre-modern eras, thus allowing us to engage in more suitable comparative practices in the study of esotericism. On another level, I have argued elsewhere that an Islamic esotericism (bāṭiniyya) has a long history dating back to the ninth century at least, based on principles, epistemological paradigms, and social orientations, conceptualized and negotiated (Saif, 2019). I demonstrated there, as I do here, that this esotericism had—and still has—connections with the currents discussed in the study of “Western esotericism,” especially through the Traditionalists and Sufism.","PeriodicalId":185269,"journal":{"name":"New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism","volume":"26 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446458_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In recent years, the field of “Western esotericism” has been confronted by problems related to the cultural and regional demarcations it has adopted. This field is based on a longue durée narrative that underplays non-“Western” currents, including ones which, through appropriation or reactions to them, constitutedmajor sources for it. One of themost immediate arguments against the use of the qualifier “Western” and an essentialized “West” is European entanglements with Islamdom. This article tackles the ambiguous place given to Islam in the narrative of “Western esotericism” and the wider intellectual and historical complex that feeds the exclusionary tendencies expressed by the “Western” in “Western esotericism.” It begins by providing a historical background of the West versus East divide in order to grasp the genealogy of the discourse and locate the problems resulting from an esotericism labelled as “Western.” Two major components of this narrative within which Islam is usually evoked are then highlighted: first, the sanitization of orientalist perspectives, and, second, the reliance on perennialist sources, especially the writings of Henry Corbin. Finally, the article recommends, on one level, a reflective global approach that takes into account the agency of non-Western actors in the globalization of values and concepts in modern and pre-modern eras, thus allowing us to engage in more suitable comparative practices in the study of esotericism. On another level, I have argued elsewhere that an Islamic esotericism (bāṭiniyya) has a long history dating back to the ninth century at least, based on principles, epistemological paradigms, and social orientations, conceptualized and negotiated (Saif, 2019). I demonstrated there, as I do here, that this esotericism had—and still has—connections with the currents discussed in the study of “Western esotericism,” especially through the Traditionalists and Sufism.
“我爱摩尔人是为了和他一起生活”:伊斯兰教与“西方神秘主义”研究
近年来,“西方神秘主义”领域面临着与其所采用的文化和地域界限相关的问题。这个领域是建立在一种冗长的、不重视非“西方”潮流的叙述基础上的,包括那些通过挪用或对它们的反应而构成其主要来源的潮流。反对使用限定词“西方”和本质上的“西方”的最直接的论据之一是欧洲与伊斯兰世界的纠缠。本文探讨了伊斯兰教在“西方神秘主义”叙事中的模糊地位,以及更广泛的知识和历史情结,这种情结助长了“西方”在“西方神秘主义”中所表达的排斥倾向。它首先提供了西方与东方分裂的历史背景,以便掌握话语的谱系,并定位由被标记为“西方”的神秘主义所产生的问题。在这一叙述中,伊斯兰教经常被提及的两个主要组成部分随后被强调:首先,东方主义观点的净化,其次,对长期主义来源的依赖,尤其是亨利·科尔宾的著作。最后,本文在一个层面上建议采用一种反思的全球方法,考虑到现代和前现代时代价值观和概念全球化中非西方行动者的作用,从而使我们能够在深奥主义研究中从事更合适的比较实践。在另一个层面上,我在其他地方提出,伊斯兰神秘主义(bāṭiniyya)的历史悠久,至少可以追溯到9世纪,其基础是原则、认识论范式和社会取向,是概念化和协商的(Saif, 2019)。我在那里证明了,正如我在这里所做的那样,这种神秘主义曾经——并且仍然——与“西方神秘主义”研究中讨论的潮流有联系,特别是通过传统主义者和苏菲主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信