ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM AND CAMBRIDGE CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS

R. S. F. Iskandar, A. Raditya, T. Pradipta
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM AND CAMBRIDGE CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS","authors":"R. S. F. Iskandar, A. Raditya, T. Pradipta","doi":"10.22236/kalamatika.vol6no1.2021pp99-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several factors influence the success of learning; one of them is the quality of textbooks. Textbooks have a pivotal role in learning, namely, representing the teacher's explanation in front of the class. Curricula have continuously changed because they are far from the expectations. In Indonesia, many schools have implemented an international curriculum to improve school quality. One of the curricula used is the Cambridge curriculum. This study analyzed the types of problems in the Cambridge and 2013 curriculum mathematics textbooks, especially on quadratic equations. This research utilized a six-dimensional analysis method which consists of mathematical activities, complexity level, answer form, contextual features, response types, and mathematical features. Furthermore, the data collection technique was carried out by analyzing and describing the types of questions in the 2013 curriculum and the Cambridge curriculum mathematics textbooks. The analysis focused on the quadratic equation topic in the 2013 curriculum and the Cambridge curriculum mathematics textbooks. The results shows that there is no difference between the types of problems in the 2013 curriculum and the Cambridge curriculum mathematics textbooks for quadratic equation topics. The framework of this study could be a reference for further research and used by mathematics textbook writers to create more diverse types of questions.              ","PeriodicalId":326644,"journal":{"name":"Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol6no1.2021pp99-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Several factors influence the success of learning; one of them is the quality of textbooks. Textbooks have a pivotal role in learning, namely, representing the teacher's explanation in front of the class. Curricula have continuously changed because they are far from the expectations. In Indonesia, many schools have implemented an international curriculum to improve school quality. One of the curricula used is the Cambridge curriculum. This study analyzed the types of problems in the Cambridge and 2013 curriculum mathematics textbooks, especially on quadratic equations. This research utilized a six-dimensional analysis method which consists of mathematical activities, complexity level, answer form, contextual features, response types, and mathematical features. Furthermore, the data collection technique was carried out by analyzing and describing the types of questions in the 2013 curriculum and the Cambridge curriculum mathematics textbooks. The analysis focused on the quadratic equation topic in the 2013 curriculum and the Cambridge curriculum mathematics textbooks. The results shows that there is no difference between the types of problems in the 2013 curriculum and the Cambridge curriculum mathematics textbooks for quadratic equation topics. The framework of this study could be a reference for further research and used by mathematics textbook writers to create more diverse types of questions.              
2013年课程与剑桥课程数学教材中的数学问题分析
有几个因素影响学习的成功;其中之一是教科书的质量。课本在学习中起着举足轻重的作用,它代表着老师在学生面前的讲解。课程一直在变化,因为它们与期望相差甚远。在印度尼西亚,许多学校实施了国际课程,以提高学校质量。使用的课程之一是剑桥课程。本研究分析了剑桥和2013年课程数学教科书中的问题类型,特别是二次方程。本研究采用六维分析方法,包括数学活动、复杂程度、回答形式、语境特征、回答类型和数学特征。此外,通过分析和描述2013年课程和剑桥课程数学教科书中的问题类型,进行数据收集技术。分析的重点是2013年课程和剑桥课程数学教科书中的二次方程主题。结果表明,2013年课程与剑桥课程数学教科书中关于二次方程主题的问题类型没有差异。本研究的框架可以作为进一步研究的参考,也可以为数学教科书的编写者创造更多不同类型的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信