{"title":"Delayed Medication of Antibiotics for Children with Respiratory Infections","authors":"A. López","doi":"10.47275/2379-6707-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preschoolers experience regular illness because of infections, which results in more trips to basic care than any other age group. The most common reason pediatricians visit the hospital is for respiratory tract illnesses (RTIs). Antibiotics are frequently recommended for RTIs even though they are typically self-limited and unlikely to alter the course of the disease [1]. Antibiotic use raises the likelihood that patients will experience adverse events and that they will seek counsel in the event of recurrent episodes. The limited diagnostic tools used in basic care frequently result in ambiguous diagnoses and incidents of improper antibiotic prescribing [2]. Moreover, antibiotics are provided in order to avoid complications or to satisfy parental expectations if symptoms continue. Some clinical practice guidelines advise DAP (Delayed Antibiotic Prescription) if the need for antibiotics is suspected. The scientific proof on the use of DAP in young kids is limited, with research studies only in the United States England and Jordan [3]. This occurs in some RTI infections, conjunctivitis, and urinary tract infections. Implications of the DAP method in wealthy nations with increased revenue. Antibiotic usage is unknown, as it is in southern Europe. Hence, in order to compare the effectiveness of DAP to that of IAP (Immediate Antibiotic Prescription) and NAP (No Antibiotic Prescription), we carried out a randomized trial.","PeriodicalId":355368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics and Congenital Disorders","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics and Congenital Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47275/2379-6707-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Preschoolers experience regular illness because of infections, which results in more trips to basic care than any other age group. The most common reason pediatricians visit the hospital is for respiratory tract illnesses (RTIs). Antibiotics are frequently recommended for RTIs even though they are typically self-limited and unlikely to alter the course of the disease [1]. Antibiotic use raises the likelihood that patients will experience adverse events and that they will seek counsel in the event of recurrent episodes. The limited diagnostic tools used in basic care frequently result in ambiguous diagnoses and incidents of improper antibiotic prescribing [2]. Moreover, antibiotics are provided in order to avoid complications or to satisfy parental expectations if symptoms continue. Some clinical practice guidelines advise DAP (Delayed Antibiotic Prescription) if the need for antibiotics is suspected. The scientific proof on the use of DAP in young kids is limited, with research studies only in the United States England and Jordan [3]. This occurs in some RTI infections, conjunctivitis, and urinary tract infections. Implications of the DAP method in wealthy nations with increased revenue. Antibiotic usage is unknown, as it is in southern Europe. Hence, in order to compare the effectiveness of DAP to that of IAP (Immediate Antibiotic Prescription) and NAP (No Antibiotic Prescription), we carried out a randomized trial.