Blocking vs. Non-Blocking Coordinated Checkpointing for Large-Scale Fault Tolerant MPI

Darius Buntinas, Camille Coti, Thomas Hérault, Pierre Lemarinier, Laurence Pilard, Ala Rezmerita, Eric Rodriguez, F. Cappello
{"title":"Blocking vs. Non-Blocking Coordinated Checkpointing for Large-Scale Fault Tolerant MPI","authors":"Darius Buntinas, Camille Coti, Thomas Hérault, Pierre Lemarinier, Laurence Pilard, Ala Rezmerita, Eric Rodriguez, F. Cappello","doi":"10.1145/1188455.1188587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A long-term trend in high-performance computing is the increasing number of nodes in parallel computing platforms, which entails a higher failure probability. Fault programming environments should be used to guarantee the safe execution of critical applications. Research in fault tolerant MPI has led to the development of several fault tolerant MPI environments. Different approaches are being proposed using a variety of fault tolerant message passing protocols based on coordinated checkpointing or message logging. The most popular approach is with coordinated checkpointing. In the literature, two different concepts of coordinated checkpointing have been proposed: blocking and non-blocking. However they have never been compared quantitatively and their respective scalability remains unknown. The contribution of this paper is to provide the first comparison between these two approaches and a study of their scalability. We have implemented the two approaches within the MPICH environments and evaluate their performance using the NAS parallel benchmarks","PeriodicalId":333909,"journal":{"name":"ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"163","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1188455.1188587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 163

Abstract

A long-term trend in high-performance computing is the increasing number of nodes in parallel computing platforms, which entails a higher failure probability. Fault programming environments should be used to guarantee the safe execution of critical applications. Research in fault tolerant MPI has led to the development of several fault tolerant MPI environments. Different approaches are being proposed using a variety of fault tolerant message passing protocols based on coordinated checkpointing or message logging. The most popular approach is with coordinated checkpointing. In the literature, two different concepts of coordinated checkpointing have been proposed: blocking and non-blocking. However they have never been compared quantitatively and their respective scalability remains unknown. The contribution of this paper is to provide the first comparison between these two approaches and a study of their scalability. We have implemented the two approaches within the MPICH environments and evaluate their performance using the NAS parallel benchmarks
大规模容错MPI的阻塞与非阻塞协调检查点
高性能计算的一个长期趋势是并行计算平台上节点数量的增加,这意味着更高的故障概率。应该使用故障编程环境来保证关键应用程序的安全执行。对容错MPI的研究导致了几种容错MPI环境的发展。使用基于协调检查点或消息日志的各种容错消息传递协议,提出了不同的方法。最流行的方法是协调检查点。在文献中,已经提出了两种不同的协调检查点概念:阻塞和非阻塞。然而,它们从来没有被定量地比较过,它们各自的可扩展性仍然未知。本文的贡献在于首次比较了这两种方法,并研究了它们的可扩展性。我们已经在MPICH环境中实现了这两种方法,并使用NAS并行基准测试评估了它们的性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信