{"title":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Growth Regimes in the United States","authors":"J. Appert, Ege Can, Frank M. Fossen","doi":"10.33141/PO.2021.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate \nregional growth regimes in the US states from 1980 to 2014. Based on start-up \nrates and employment growth as suggested by Audretsch and Fritsch (2002), we \nclassify states into routinized, entrepreneurial, revolving door, and \ndownsizing regimes. The results indicate that there was no significant \nassociation between start-up rates and employment growth in the 1980s, but a \npositive relationship in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s. Further, we document that \nthe entrepreneurial and the downsizing regimes are attractor regimes that tend \nto stick, whereas the routinized and revolving door regimes are transitionary \nregimes. Importantly, states in the routinized regime predominantly move to the \ndownsizing regime, suggesting that an over-reliance on established companies \nrelative to start-ups in the state may threaten employment growth in the long \nrun.","PeriodicalId":337871,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Organizacji","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Organizacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33141/PO.2021.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
We investigate
regional growth regimes in the US states from 1980 to 2014. Based on start-up
rates and employment growth as suggested by Audretsch and Fritsch (2002), we
classify states into routinized, entrepreneurial, revolving door, and
downsizing regimes. The results indicate that there was no significant
association between start-up rates and employment growth in the 1980s, but a
positive relationship in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s. Further, we document that
the entrepreneurial and the downsizing regimes are attractor regimes that tend
to stick, whereas the routinized and revolving door regimes are transitionary
regimes. Importantly, states in the routinized regime predominantly move to the
downsizing regime, suggesting that an over-reliance on established companies
relative to start-ups in the state may threaten employment growth in the long
run.