Understanding Mobile Money Grievances from Tweets

Kushal Shah, Shrirang Mare, Richard J. Anderson
{"title":"Understanding Mobile Money Grievances from Tweets","authors":"Kushal Shah, Shrirang Mare, Richard J. Anderson","doi":"10.1145/3287098.3287123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to financial services through a mobile phone, known as Mobile Financial Services (MFS), creates an opportunity to expand the reach of financial services to the 1.7 billion unbanked adults worldwide. Nevertheless, MFS adoption has been inconsistent, which motivates a need to identify the challenges that MFS users confront in different countries. In this work, we explore the Twitter as a potential data source to understand such challenges. More broadly, we assess whether (and how) publicly available Twitter data can augment the findings of expensive, large-scale research studies on MFS barriers. Our Qualitative Content Analysis of 9,000 mobile money grievance tweets that were extracted from 54 MFS customer care twitter feeds across six countries reveals service and access issues, incorrect transactions, and fraud as three main challenges MFS users report on Twitter. We discuss the nuances around these challenges and the substantial differences between the common issues reported in different countries. Ultimately, we conclude that Twitter data can elucidate the challenges of MFS adoption and also that it can augment the results of other types of MFS studies.","PeriodicalId":303936,"journal":{"name":"ICPS Proceedings","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICPS Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to financial services through a mobile phone, known as Mobile Financial Services (MFS), creates an opportunity to expand the reach of financial services to the 1.7 billion unbanked adults worldwide. Nevertheless, MFS adoption has been inconsistent, which motivates a need to identify the challenges that MFS users confront in different countries. In this work, we explore the Twitter as a potential data source to understand such challenges. More broadly, we assess whether (and how) publicly available Twitter data can augment the findings of expensive, large-scale research studies on MFS barriers. Our Qualitative Content Analysis of 9,000 mobile money grievance tweets that were extracted from 54 MFS customer care twitter feeds across six countries reveals service and access issues, incorrect transactions, and fraud as three main challenges MFS users report on Twitter. We discuss the nuances around these challenges and the substantial differences between the common issues reported in different countries. Ultimately, we conclude that Twitter data can elucidate the challenges of MFS adoption and also that it can augment the results of other types of MFS studies.
从推特上了解对移动支付的不满
通过移动电话获得金融服务,即移动金融服务(MFS),为将金融服务范围扩大到全球17亿无银行账户的成年人创造了机会。然而,MFS的采用一直不一致,这促使有必要确定MFS用户在不同国家面临的挑战。在这项工作中,我们探索Twitter作为一个潜在的数据源来理解这些挑战。更广泛地说,我们评估公开可用的Twitter数据是否(以及如何)可以增强对MFS障碍的昂贵的大规模研究的发现。我们对来自6个国家54个MFS客户服务推特的9000条移动货币投诉推文进行了定性内容分析,发现服务和访问问题、错误交易和欺诈是MFS用户在推特上报告的三大主要挑战。我们讨论了这些挑战的细微差别,以及不同国家报告的共同问题之间的实质性差异。最后,我们得出结论,Twitter数据可以阐明MFS采用的挑战,也可以增强其他类型MFS研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信