COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the Adult General Population of India

S. Dudani, Shubhangini Sachdeva, S. Mangalesh
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the Adult General Population of India","authors":"S. Dudani, Shubhangini Sachdeva, S. Mangalesh","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10070-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ab s t r Ac t Aim and background: Two vaccines for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), by Bharat Biotech and Serum Institute of India, have been approved by the Indian Government for administration. This study attempts to analyze vaccine hesitancy in the general adult population of India. Materials and methods: A pan-India cross-sectional survey, adapted for GoogleForms®, was circulated before the rollout of vaccines to assess vaccine hesitancy. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables as a percentage. The Chi-square test was used for associations. Results: Seven hundred and sixty-two responses were analyzed. 27.2% of respondents demonstrated vaccine hesitancy. 59.4% of vaccine acceptors preferred getting the vaccine from government healthcare establishments over private-sector establishments. No significant associations were observed between vaccine acceptance and age or gender. Those who accepted the vaccine were more likely to believe that it should be compulsory (p = 0.00001) and safety measures should be continued even after vaccine administration (p = 0.043). IT-related professionals showed 82.6% vaccine acceptance, healthcare professionals displayed 73.5%, while lawyers showed 53.3% acceptance. There was no association between vaccine acceptance and being a frontline worker, previously having COVID-19, or having a family member who suffered from COVID-19. Despite Delhi and Maharashtra being the highest COVID-19 burden areas, the general population of these two states was more likely to refuse the vaccine than the residents of other states (p = 0.027). Conclusion: This study identified the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy in the Indian population. Consistent dialogue between the government and the public is essential for trust-building. Educational intervention through an evidenced-based approach by government authorities is the need of the hour.","PeriodicalId":223367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Academics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Academics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10070-0070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ab s t r Ac t Aim and background: Two vaccines for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), by Bharat Biotech and Serum Institute of India, have been approved by the Indian Government for administration. This study attempts to analyze vaccine hesitancy in the general adult population of India. Materials and methods: A pan-India cross-sectional survey, adapted for GoogleForms®, was circulated before the rollout of vaccines to assess vaccine hesitancy. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables as a percentage. The Chi-square test was used for associations. Results: Seven hundred and sixty-two responses were analyzed. 27.2% of respondents demonstrated vaccine hesitancy. 59.4% of vaccine acceptors preferred getting the vaccine from government healthcare establishments over private-sector establishments. No significant associations were observed between vaccine acceptance and age or gender. Those who accepted the vaccine were more likely to believe that it should be compulsory (p = 0.00001) and safety measures should be continued even after vaccine administration (p = 0.043). IT-related professionals showed 82.6% vaccine acceptance, healthcare professionals displayed 73.5%, while lawyers showed 53.3% acceptance. There was no association between vaccine acceptance and being a frontline worker, previously having COVID-19, or having a family member who suffered from COVID-19. Despite Delhi and Maharashtra being the highest COVID-19 burden areas, the general population of these two states was more likely to refuse the vaccine than the residents of other states (p = 0.027). Conclusion: This study identified the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy in the Indian population. Consistent dialogue between the government and the public is essential for trust-building. Educational intervention through an evidenced-based approach by government authorities is the need of the hour.
印度成年普通人群对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫
目的和背景:由巴拉特生物技术公司和印度血清研究所研制的两种针对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疫苗已获得印度政府的批准。本研究试图分析印度一般成年人的疫苗犹豫。材料和方法:一项适用于GoogleForms®的泛印度横断面调查在疫苗推出之前进行了分发,以评估疫苗犹豫性。连续变量以均数±标准差表示,分类变量以百分比表示。相关性采用卡方检验。结果:共分析762份问卷。27.2%的应答者表现出疫苗犹豫。59.4%的疫苗接受者倾向于从政府卫生保健机构而不是私营机构接种疫苗。疫苗接受度与年龄或性别之间没有显著关联。接受疫苗接种的人更有可能认为疫苗接种应该是强制性的(p = 0.00001),即使在接种疫苗后也应该继续采取安全措施(p = 0.043)。it行业的疫苗接受度为82.6%,卫生保健行业为73.5%,律师行业为53.3%。接受疫苗接种与一线工作人员、既往感染COVID-19或家庭成员感染COVID-19之间没有关联。尽管德里和马哈拉施特拉邦是COVID-19负担最重的地区,但这两个邦的一般人群比其他邦的居民更有可能拒绝接种疫苗(p = 0.027)。结论:本研究确定了印度人群中疫苗犹豫的患病率。政府和公众之间的持续对话对于建立信任至关重要。政府当局通过循证方法进行教育干预是当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书