Applying the Papakonstantinidis 3-ple-win-model on the Social Welfare System of the Labor Markets in Greece and Germany

T. Kronberger, L. Papakonstantinidis
{"title":"Applying the Papakonstantinidis 3-ple-win-model on the Social Welfare System of the Labor Markets in Greece and Germany","authors":"T. Kronberger, L. Papakonstantinidis","doi":"10.13189/UJM.2019.070201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to show the bargaining possibilities when there are three involved parties on a labor market and two of them are active decision-makers. The continuous conflict is between the three main bargaining power poles i.e., State; Company; Citizen. This conflict landscape is directly correlated with the development dynamical trends coming especially from the rapid rate of world urbanization: Market forces based on Instant Reflection Individual Mixed Strategies (IRIMS) between the three power poles i.e. Business, Citizen and the Community (State) shape the labor market by a continuous dynamic evolution. We will show possible solutions for increasing the benefit for all three parties. The “win-win-win papakonstantinidis model” with a 3-ple view in the labor market as the result of a continuous conflict among interests’ power poles' i.e. Business-Citizen and the Community (State) for the domination over the labor market The 3ple win involvement, able to create equilibrium point in a pay-off matrix coming from “best responses\", of the three stakeholders As introduction basic statistical data from Greece and Germany will be presented and structured. After this the different behaviors of the parties in both countries will be regarded and their bargaining success will be illustrated.","PeriodicalId":211193,"journal":{"name":"Universal journal of management","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal journal of management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/UJM.2019.070201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show the bargaining possibilities when there are three involved parties on a labor market and two of them are active decision-makers. The continuous conflict is between the three main bargaining power poles i.e., State; Company; Citizen. This conflict landscape is directly correlated with the development dynamical trends coming especially from the rapid rate of world urbanization: Market forces based on Instant Reflection Individual Mixed Strategies (IRIMS) between the three power poles i.e. Business, Citizen and the Community (State) shape the labor market by a continuous dynamic evolution. We will show possible solutions for increasing the benefit for all three parties. The “win-win-win papakonstantinidis model” with a 3-ple view in the labor market as the result of a continuous conflict among interests’ power poles' i.e. Business-Citizen and the Community (State) for the domination over the labor market The 3ple win involvement, able to create equilibrium point in a pay-off matrix coming from “best responses", of the three stakeholders As introduction basic statistical data from Greece and Germany will be presented and structured. After this the different behaviors of the parties in both countries will be regarded and their bargaining success will be illustrated.
Papakonstantinidis三赢模型在希腊和德国劳动力市场社会福利制度中的应用
本文的目的是展示当劳动力市场上有三个参与方,其中两个是积极的决策者时讨价还价的可能性。持续不断的冲突发生在三个主要谈判力量之间,即国家;公司;公民。这种冲突景观与发展动态趋势直接相关,特别是来自世界城市化的快速发展:基于即时反映的个人混合策略(IRIMS)的市场力量在三个力量之间,即企业,公民和社区(国家)通过持续的动态演变塑造了劳动力市场。我们将展示增加三方利益的可能解决方案。“三赢帕帕康斯坦尼迪斯模型”是劳动力市场的三方视角,认为这是利益“权力极”之间持续冲突的结果,即企业-公民和社区(国家)对劳动力市场的统治。三方共赢参与,能够在来自三个利益相关者的“最佳反应”的回报矩阵中创造平衡点,作为介绍,来自希腊和德国的基本统计数据将被呈现和结构化。在此之后,双方当事人的不同行为将被视为和他们的议价成功将被说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信