It May Be Engineering Design, but Is It Design?

R. Bannerot
{"title":"It May Be Engineering Design, but Is It Design?","authors":"R. Bannerot","doi":"10.18260/1-2-620-38468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Houston Abstract Creative design is not taught in most engineering academic programs. The engineering design textbooks (and presumably engineering design classes) do a good job presenting analytical schemes for the systematic evaluation of design and linear design processes --both of which are necessary and appropriate for much of engineering design -- but they really have little to say about the creative, parallel processing necessary for design. It is suggested that engineering students and design faculty would benefit greatly from a good dose of creative design as practiced by our colleagues in the Arts. The paper will provide evidence of how two aspects of “creativity” are missing from most engineering","PeriodicalId":355306,"journal":{"name":"2003 GSW Proceedings","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 GSW Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Houston Abstract Creative design is not taught in most engineering academic programs. The engineering design textbooks (and presumably engineering design classes) do a good job presenting analytical schemes for the systematic evaluation of design and linear design processes --both of which are necessary and appropriate for much of engineering design -- but they really have little to say about the creative, parallel processing necessary for design. It is suggested that engineering students and design faculty would benefit greatly from a good dose of creative design as practiced by our colleagues in the Arts. The paper will provide evidence of how two aspects of “creativity” are missing from most engineering
它可能是工程设计,但它是设计吗?
大多数工程学术课程都不教授创意设计。工程设计教科书(想必还有工程设计课程)很好地展示了对设计和线性设计过程进行系统评估的分析方案——这两种方法对大部分工程设计来说都是必要和合适的——但它们对设计所必需的创造性、并行处理几乎没有说什么。我们建议,工程专业的学生和设计专业的教师将从我们的艺术同行所实践的大量创造性设计中受益匪浅。本文将提供证据,说明大多数工程中“创造力”的两个方面是如何缺失的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信