(Un)making a Monster: Melodrama, The Satirist, and the Cartoons of Samuel De Wilde

David Mayer, Michael Gamer
{"title":"(Un)making a Monster: Melodrama, The Satirist, and the Cartoons of Samuel De Wilde","authors":"David Mayer, Michael Gamer","doi":"10.1177/17483727211039815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our essay takes up the well-known satirical print, ‘The Monster Melo-Drame’, and re-attaches it to several contexts to bring forward its richness and ambiguity as an image. We begin by considering its artist (Samuel De Wilde), printer (Samuel Tipper), and publisher (The Satirist), interpreting the print in its original publication and in dialogue with the essay that accompanied it in the January 1808 issue of the Satirist. The image, we argue, should not be read on its own but rather as the first of a trio of prints De Wilde made for that magazine. Taken together, the images show the Satirist engaging in a sustained campaign against London’s Theatres Royal, one in which melodrama is a subject but not a primary target. Part of our essay’s work is necessarily that of description: identifying figures, references, and tableaux as these prints comment on a rapidly changing theatrical scene between 1807 and 1809. Considered as a set, De Wilde’s prints constituted a fundamental part of the Satirist’s attacks on the Drury Lane Theatre management, particularly Richard Brinsley Sheridan and his son Thomas Sheridan, whom they represent as corrupt caretakers of that institution and of the national drama.","PeriodicalId":286523,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth Century Theatre and Film","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth Century Theatre and Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17483727211039815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Our essay takes up the well-known satirical print, ‘The Monster Melo-Drame’, and re-attaches it to several contexts to bring forward its richness and ambiguity as an image. We begin by considering its artist (Samuel De Wilde), printer (Samuel Tipper), and publisher (The Satirist), interpreting the print in its original publication and in dialogue with the essay that accompanied it in the January 1808 issue of the Satirist. The image, we argue, should not be read on its own but rather as the first of a trio of prints De Wilde made for that magazine. Taken together, the images show the Satirist engaging in a sustained campaign against London’s Theatres Royal, one in which melodrama is a subject but not a primary target. Part of our essay’s work is necessarily that of description: identifying figures, references, and tableaux as these prints comment on a rapidly changing theatrical scene between 1807 and 1809. Considered as a set, De Wilde’s prints constituted a fundamental part of the Satirist’s attacks on the Drury Lane Theatre management, particularly Richard Brinsley Sheridan and his son Thomas Sheridan, whom they represent as corrupt caretakers of that institution and of the national drama.
制作怪物:情节剧、讽刺作家和塞缪尔·德·王尔德的漫画
我们的文章采用了著名的讽刺版画“怪物Melo-Drame”,并将其重新连接到几个语境中,以提出其作为图像的丰富性和模糊性。我们首先考虑它的艺术家(塞缪尔·德·王尔德)、印刷商(塞缪尔·蒂珀)和出版商(讽刺家),在它的原始出版物中解释它,并与1808年1月《讽刺家》杂志上的随笔进行对话。我们认为,这张照片不应该单独阅读,而应该作为王尔德为该杂志创作的三幅版画中的第一张。综合来看,这些照片显示出讽刺作家参与了一场反对伦敦皇家剧院的持续运动,在皇家剧院中,情节剧是一个主题,但不是主要目标。我们论文的一部分工作是描述:识别人物,参考文献和场景,因为这些版画评论了1807年至1809年间迅速变化的戏剧场景。作为一个集合,德·王尔德的版画构成了讽刺作家对德鲁里街剧院管理层的攻击的基本组成部分,尤其是理查德·布林斯利·谢里登和他的儿子托马斯·谢里登,他们把他们描绘成该机构和国家戏剧的腐败管理者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信