Pemodelan Numerik Bangunan Peredam Energi Bendungan Pomalaa dengan Analisa Komputasi Fluida Dinamis

Delivean Rakha Dermawan, Evi Nur Cahya, Dian Sisinggih
{"title":"Pemodelan Numerik Bangunan Peredam Energi Bendungan Pomalaa dengan Analisa Komputasi Fluida Dinamis","authors":"Delivean Rakha Dermawan, Evi Nur Cahya, Dian Sisinggih","doi":"10.21776/ub.pengairan.2021.012.02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the physical model testing Pomalaa Dam spillway, the series 4 energy dissipator which has a base elevation of +41,00 m has been able to dissipate the flow energy well at the Q 100y , Q 1000y , and Q PMF , but it is necessary to try alternative designs that more effective and efficient. The method used is a numerical model simulation using an application based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), then the result will be verified with physical model using Brier-Skill Score (BSS). After that, an alternative design was carried out in the form of a variation in the base elevation of the energy dissipator, that are +42,00 m; +43,00 m; and +44,00 m, then the best model is selected as a recommendation from the simulation result. The result of the verification of the numerical model using BSS show that numerical model is quite capable of representing the physical model. The best simulation result is an energy dissipator with a base elevation of +42,00 with efficiency of energy dissipation at Q 100y , Q 1000y","PeriodicalId":236511,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknik Pengairan","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknik Pengairan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.pengairan.2021.012.02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the physical model testing Pomalaa Dam spillway, the series 4 energy dissipator which has a base elevation of +41,00 m has been able to dissipate the flow energy well at the Q 100y , Q 1000y , and Q PMF , but it is necessary to try alternative designs that more effective and efficient. The method used is a numerical model simulation using an application based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), then the result will be verified with physical model using Brier-Skill Score (BSS). After that, an alternative design was carried out in the form of a variation in the base elevation of the energy dissipator, that are +42,00 m; +43,00 m; and +44,00 m, then the best model is selected as a recommendation from the simulation result. The result of the verification of the numerical model using BSS show that numerical model is quite capable of representing the physical model. The best simulation result is an energy dissipator with a base elevation of +42,00 with efficiency of energy dissipation at Q 100y , Q 1000y
用动态流体分析建模数值结构降低波马拉亚大坝的能量
在波玛拉坝泄洪道物理模型试验中,基高程+ 41000 m的4系列消能器在q100y、q1000y和qpmf处都能很好地消能,但有必要尝试更有效的替代设计。采用基于计算流体动力学(CFD)的数值模拟方法,然后采用Brier-Skill Score (BSS)的物理模型对结果进行验证。在此之后,进行了另一种设计,其形式是在耗能器的基础高程上进行变化,即+ 42,000 m;+ 43, 00米;+44 000 m,然后从仿真结果中选择最佳模型作为推荐。利用BSS对数值模型的验证结果表明,数值模型能较好地表征物理模型。仿真结果最好的是基高程为+42,00的消能器,其消能效率为q100y, q1000y
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信