Analysis of results in dependability benchmarking: Can we do better?

Miquel Martínez, D. Andrés, J. Ruiz, Jesus Friginal
{"title":"Analysis of results in dependability benchmarking: Can we do better?","authors":"Miquel Martínez, D. Andrés, J. Ruiz, Jesus Friginal","doi":"10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dependability benchmarking has become through the years more and more important in the process of systems evaluation. The increasing need for making systems more dependable in presence of perturbations has contributed to this fact. Nevertheless, even though many studies have focused on different areas related to dependability benchmarking, and some others have focused on the need of providing these benchmarks with good quality measures, there is still a gap in the process of the analysis of results. This paper focuses on providing a first glance at different approaches that may help filling this gap by making explicit the criteria followed in the decision making process.","PeriodicalId":218660,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Dependability benchmarking has become through the years more and more important in the process of systems evaluation. The increasing need for making systems more dependable in presence of perturbations has contributed to this fact. Nevertheless, even though many studies have focused on different areas related to dependability benchmarking, and some others have focused on the need of providing these benchmarks with good quality measures, there is still a gap in the process of the analysis of results. This paper focuses on providing a first glance at different approaches that may help filling this gap by making explicit the criteria followed in the decision making process.
可靠性基准测试结果分析:我们能做得更好吗?
多年来,可靠性基准测试在系统评估过程中变得越来越重要。对使系统在存在扰动时更加可靠的日益增长的需求促成了这一事实。然而,尽管许多研究侧重于与可靠性基准相关的不同领域,也有一些研究侧重于需要为这些基准提供良好的质量措施,但在结果分析过程中仍然存在差距。本文的重点是通过明确决策过程中遵循的标准,提供对不同方法的初步了解,这些方法可能有助于填补这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信