Source/Goal (a)symmetry

B. Fagard, Anetta Kopecka
{"title":"Source/Goal (a)symmetry","authors":"B. Fagard, Anetta Kopecka","doi":"10.1075/sl.00016.fag","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper compares the expression of Source and Goal in German and Polish, on the basis of descriptions elicited with a\n series of video clips. As satellite-framed languages (Talmy 1985, 2000), both German and Polish mainly rely on grammatical morphemes to encode Path of motion with respect to Source\n and Goal. Nevertheless, despite this shared typological feature, these languages also display fine morphosyntactic and semantic differences.\n Our study reveals that the expression of Source and Goal is more asymmetrical in German than in Polish, both in types of\n linguistic resources and in semantic distinctions. We show that German speakers tend to combine Path satellites with Path verbs – including\n both deictic satellites and deictic verbs – more frequently in Source-oriented events, depicting them with finer semantic distinctions than\n Goal-oriented events. In the expression of the Ground, however, they tend to make finer distinctions in the expression of Goals as compared\n to Sources, by using a greater variety of prepositions. Polish speakers, by contrast, tend to express Source and Goal in a more symmetrical\n fashion. These cross-linguistic differences are discussed in the light of language-specific characteristics and their role in the\n expression – symmetrical or asymmetrical – of Source and Goal.","PeriodicalId":113438,"journal":{"name":"Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.00016.fag","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper compares the expression of Source and Goal in German and Polish, on the basis of descriptions elicited with a series of video clips. As satellite-framed languages (Talmy 1985, 2000), both German and Polish mainly rely on grammatical morphemes to encode Path of motion with respect to Source and Goal. Nevertheless, despite this shared typological feature, these languages also display fine morphosyntactic and semantic differences. Our study reveals that the expression of Source and Goal is more asymmetrical in German than in Polish, both in types of linguistic resources and in semantic distinctions. We show that German speakers tend to combine Path satellites with Path verbs – including both deictic satellites and deictic verbs – more frequently in Source-oriented events, depicting them with finer semantic distinctions than Goal-oriented events. In the expression of the Ground, however, they tend to make finer distinctions in the expression of Goals as compared to Sources, by using a greater variety of prepositions. Polish speakers, by contrast, tend to express Source and Goal in a more symmetrical fashion. These cross-linguistic differences are discussed in the light of language-specific characteristics and their role in the expression – symmetrical or asymmetrical – of Source and Goal.
源/目标(一)对称
本文通过对一系列视频片段的描述,比较了德语和波兰语中“源”和“目的”的表达。作为卫星框架语言(Talmy 1985,2000),德语和波兰语主要依靠语法语素对源和目标的运动路径进行编码。然而,尽管有这种共同的类型学特征,这些语言也表现出细微的形态句法和语义差异。我们的研究表明,在语言资源类型和语义区别上,德语中源和目的的表达比波兰语更不对称。我们发现,讲德语的人倾向于将路径卫星和路径动词(包括指示卫星和指示动词)结合起来,在面向源的事件中使用频率更高,与面向目标的事件相比,用更精细的语义区分来描述它们。然而,在表达“根据”时,他们倾向于通过使用更多种类的介词来区分“目的”和“源”。相比之下,讲波兰语的人倾向于以更对称的方式表达Source和Goal。这些跨语言差异是根据语言的特殊性及其在源和目的的对称或不对称表达中的作用来讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信