FOAM: A Lightweight Method for Verification of Use-Cases

V. Simko, P. Hnetynka, T. Bures, F. Plášil
{"title":"FOAM: A Lightweight Method for Verification of Use-Cases","authors":"V. Simko, P. Hnetynka, T. Bures, F. Plášil","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2012.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advantage of textual use-cases is that they can be easily understood by stakeholders and domain experts. However, since use-cases typically rely on a natural language, they cannot be directly subject to a formal verification. In this paper, we present the FOAM method which features simple user-definable annotations, inserted into a use-case to make its semantics more suitable for verification. Subsequently a model-checking tool verifies temporal invariants associated with the annotations. This way, FOAM allows for harnessing the benefits of model-checking while still keeping the use-cases understandable for non-experts.","PeriodicalId":298734,"journal":{"name":"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","volume":"433 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2012.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The advantage of textual use-cases is that they can be easily understood by stakeholders and domain experts. However, since use-cases typically rely on a natural language, they cannot be directly subject to a formal verification. In this paper, we present the FOAM method which features simple user-definable annotations, inserted into a use-case to make its semantics more suitable for verification. Subsequently a model-checking tool verifies temporal invariants associated with the annotations. This way, FOAM allows for harnessing the benefits of model-checking while still keeping the use-cases understandable for non-experts.
泡沫:用于验证用例的轻量级方法
文本用例的优点是,涉众和领域专家可以很容易地理解它们。然而,由于用例通常依赖于自然语言,它们不能直接服从于正式的验证。在本文中,我们提出了FOAM方法,它具有简单的用户可定义注释,插入到用例中,使其语义更适合验证。随后,模型检查工具将验证与注释相关的时态不变量。通过这种方式,FOAM允许利用模型检查的好处,同时仍然保持非专家可以理解的用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信