Application of Bio-Resorbable Membranes in Preventing Complications of Lower Jaw Surgery

Tušek Ivan, Pohodenko-Chudakova Irina, Tserakhava Nikolaevna, Maksimovich Ekaterina, Karsyuk Yuri, Savich Alexander, Mladenović Raša
{"title":"Application of Bio-Resorbable Membranes in Preventing Complications of Lower Jaw Surgery","authors":"Tušek Ivan, Pohodenko-Chudakova Irina, Tserakhava Nikolaevna, Maksimovich Ekaterina, Karsyuk Yuri, Savich Alexander, Mladenović Raša","doi":"10.2478/bjdm-2021-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Background/Aim: Prevention of inflammation and alveolar bone atrophy is very important in oral surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the use of two osteoplastic bio-resorbable membranes in order to prevent inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible after surgical interventions. Material and Methods: We examined 86 patients 45-70 years old who were classified into four groups. In group 1, there were 21 patients who had a “bio-resorbable membrane type 1 implanted. The group 2 consisted of 23 persons treated with bio-resorbable membrane type 2. Only the occurrence of inflammatory complications after the placement of these membranes was monitored. Group 3 included 20 persons treated with membrane type 1 and group 4 included 22 patients treated with membrane type 2 to prevent both inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible. The level of atrophy of the alveolar bone after one year was determined by cone-beam computed tomography. The obtained data were statistically evaluated. Results: Six inflammatory complications (“dry socket”) have been identified in operated patients treated with a membrane type 1 (the first and the third groups). Only two “dry socket” occurred in patients treated with membrane type 2 (the second and fourth groups). Group 4 had significant advantages in the alveolar crest height 14.6 (11.2-22.3) and in its width 7.7 (5.1-10.2) both in relation to the indices of group 3 (11.1 (9.7-20.4) and 6.2 (4.2-9.0). Conclusions: The bio-resorbable membrane type 2 prevented inflammatory complications in the short postoperative period after surgical interventions, as well as, the atrophy of the mandible.","PeriodicalId":161469,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjdm-2021-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Background/Aim: Prevention of inflammation and alveolar bone atrophy is very important in oral surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the use of two osteoplastic bio-resorbable membranes in order to prevent inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible after surgical interventions. Material and Methods: We examined 86 patients 45-70 years old who were classified into four groups. In group 1, there were 21 patients who had a “bio-resorbable membrane type 1 implanted. The group 2 consisted of 23 persons treated with bio-resorbable membrane type 2. Only the occurrence of inflammatory complications after the placement of these membranes was monitored. Group 3 included 20 persons treated with membrane type 1 and group 4 included 22 patients treated with membrane type 2 to prevent both inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible. The level of atrophy of the alveolar bone after one year was determined by cone-beam computed tomography. The obtained data were statistically evaluated. Results: Six inflammatory complications (“dry socket”) have been identified in operated patients treated with a membrane type 1 (the first and the third groups). Only two “dry socket” occurred in patients treated with membrane type 2 (the second and fourth groups). Group 4 had significant advantages in the alveolar crest height 14.6 (11.2-22.3) and in its width 7.7 (5.1-10.2) both in relation to the indices of group 3 (11.1 (9.7-20.4) and 6.2 (4.2-9.0). Conclusions: The bio-resorbable membrane type 2 prevented inflammatory complications in the short postoperative period after surgical interventions, as well as, the atrophy of the mandible.
生物可吸收膜在预防下颌手术并发症中的应用
背景/目的:在口腔外科手术中,预防炎症和牙槽骨萎缩是非常重要的。本研究的目的是比较两种骨塑生物可吸收膜的使用,以防止手术干预后下颌牙槽部分的炎症并发症和萎缩。材料与方法:86例年龄45-70岁的患者分为四组。第一组21例患者植入1型生物可吸收膜。第二组23人采用生物可吸收膜2型治疗。仅监测这些膜放置后炎症并发症的发生情况。第3组20例采用1型膜治疗,第4组22例采用2型膜治疗,以预防炎症并发症和下颌牙槽部萎缩。一年后的牙槽骨萎缩程度通过锥形束计算机断层扫描测定。对所得数据进行统计学评价。结果:采用1型膜(第一组和第三组)治疗的手术患者中发现6例炎症并发症(“干窝”)。在膜2型治疗的患者(第二组和第四组)中,只有两个“干窝”发生。第4组牙槽嵴高度14.6(11.2 ~ 22.3),牙槽嵴宽度7.7(5.1 ~ 10.2),较第3组(11.1(9.7 ~ 20.4)和第6.2组(4.2 ~ 9.0)有显著优势。结论:2型生物可吸收膜可在术后短时间内预防炎症并发症,抑制下颌骨萎缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信