Implementing Interdisciplinary Paradox Research

R. Bednarek, M. Cunha, J. Schad, Wendy K. Smith
{"title":"Implementing Interdisciplinary Paradox Research","authors":"R. Bednarek, M. Cunha, J. Schad, Wendy K. Smith","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X2021000073B002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interdisciplinary research allows us to broaden our sights and expand our theories. Yet, such research surfaces a number of challenges. We highlight three issues – superficiality, lack of focus, and consilience - and discuss how they can be addressed in interdisciplinary research. In particular, we focus on the implications for interdisciplinary work with paradox scholarship. We explore how these issues can be navigated as scholars bring together different epistemologies, ontologies and methodologies within interdisciplinary research, and illustrate our key points by drawing on extant work in paradox theory and on examples from this double volume. Our paper contributes to paradox scholarship, and to organizational theory more broadly, by offering practices about how to implement interdisciplinary research while also advancing our understanding about available research methods.","PeriodicalId":185924,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2021000073B002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research allows us to broaden our sights and expand our theories. Yet, such research surfaces a number of challenges. We highlight three issues – superficiality, lack of focus, and consilience - and discuss how they can be addressed in interdisciplinary research. In particular, we focus on the implications for interdisciplinary work with paradox scholarship. We explore how these issues can be navigated as scholars bring together different epistemologies, ontologies and methodologies within interdisciplinary research, and illustrate our key points by drawing on extant work in paradox theory and on examples from this double volume. Our paper contributes to paradox scholarship, and to organizational theory more broadly, by offering practices about how to implement interdisciplinary research while also advancing our understanding about available research methods.
实施跨学科悖论研究
跨学科研究使我们开阔了视野,扩展了理论。然而,这样的研究也面临着许多挑战。我们强调了三个问题——肤浅、缺乏重点和一致性——并讨论了如何在跨学科研究中解决这些问题。特别是,我们关注悖论奖学金对跨学科工作的影响。当学者们在跨学科研究中汇集不同的认识论、本体论和方法时,我们将探讨如何解决这些问题,并通过借鉴悖论理论的现有工作和本双卷中的例子来说明我们的关键点。我们的论文通过提供如何实施跨学科研究的实践,同时也促进了我们对现有研究方法的理解,为悖论奖学金和更广泛的组织理论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信