Modelling Oil Price Volatility Before, During and after the Global Financial Crisis

Afees A. Salisu
{"title":"Modelling Oil Price Volatility Before, During and after the Global Financial Crisis","authors":"Afees A. Salisu","doi":"10.1111/opec.12037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluate the comparative performance of volatility models for oil price using daily returns of crude oil price. The innovations of this paper are in three folds: (i) we consider two prominent oil prices namely Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI); (ii) we analyse these prices across three subsamples namely periods before, during and after the global financial crisis; and (iii) we also analyse the comparative performance of both symmetric and asymmetric volatility models for these oil prices. We find inconsistent patterns in the performance of the volatility models over the subsamples. On the average, however, we find evidence of leverage effects in both oil prices and therefore, investors in the oil market react to news. Specifically, we find that bad news in the oil market increased volatility in crude oil price than good news. We also find high level of persistence in the volatility of WTI and Brent although the latter appears more persistent than the former while the period of global financial crisis recorded the highest level of persistence in both prices. Also, we find that during the global financial crisis, risk averse investors shifted assets from the oil market to other less risky assets.","PeriodicalId":233145,"journal":{"name":"Global Commodity Issues (Editor's Choice) eJournal","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Commodity Issues (Editor's Choice) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the comparative performance of volatility models for oil price using daily returns of crude oil price. The innovations of this paper are in three folds: (i) we consider two prominent oil prices namely Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI); (ii) we analyse these prices across three subsamples namely periods before, during and after the global financial crisis; and (iii) we also analyse the comparative performance of both symmetric and asymmetric volatility models for these oil prices. We find inconsistent patterns in the performance of the volatility models over the subsamples. On the average, however, we find evidence of leverage effects in both oil prices and therefore, investors in the oil market react to news. Specifically, we find that bad news in the oil market increased volatility in crude oil price than good news. We also find high level of persistence in the volatility of WTI and Brent although the latter appears more persistent than the former while the period of global financial crisis recorded the highest level of persistence in both prices. Also, we find that during the global financial crisis, risk averse investors shifted assets from the oil market to other less risky assets.
全球金融危机之前、期间和之后的油价波动模型
在本文中,我们用原油价格的日收益来评价油价波动率模型的比较性能。本文的创新之处在于三个方面:(i)我们考虑了两个主要的油价,即布伦特和西德克萨斯中质原油(WTI);(ii)我们分析了三个子样本的价格,即全球金融危机之前、期间和之后的时期;(iii)我们还分析了这些油价的对称和非对称波动率模型的比较表现。我们发现波动率模型在子样本上的表现不一致。然而,平均而言,我们在油价和石油市场投资者对消息的反应中都发现了杠杆效应的证据。具体来说,我们发现石油市场的坏消息比好消息更能增加原油价格的波动性。我们还发现,西德克萨斯中质油和布伦特原油的波动性具有较高的持久性,尽管后者似乎比前者更持久,而全球金融危机期间,这两种价格的持久性都达到了最高水平。此外,我们发现在全球金融危机期间,风险厌恶投资者将资产从石油市场转移到其他风险较低的资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信