Automatic Bayesian Range Estimation for Passive Bistatic Radar using Slice Sampling via Histograms

Md Shahnawaz Hussain, S. Pal
{"title":"Automatic Bayesian Range Estimation for Passive Bistatic Radar using Slice Sampling via Histograms","authors":"Md Shahnawaz Hussain, S. Pal","doi":"10.1109/ICARES56907.2022.9993594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimating the range for a Passive Bistatic Radar (PBR) is a critical problem for the signal processing research community. An efficient solution to this problem, in terms of time-complexity and estimation accuracy, has been proposed recently. This solution implemented maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), a classical technique, using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to maximize the likelihood function. Specifically, the hybrid Metropolis-Hastings (MH) MCMC method was used. In our study, we adopt the Bayesian framework to solve this problem in which the parameters of interest are considered random variables instead of unknown deterministic constants as in classical approaches. The Bayesian model accounts for the inherent randomness of the PBR system. It also incorporates prior knowledge about the parameter to be estimated into the estimator. This improves the estimation accuracy. Bayesian techniques are comparatively less computationally expensive for high-dimensional and multi-modal problems like PBR. To compute the global maximum of the target probability distribution function (pdf), we have chosen three MCMC methods, namely, MH, hybrid MH, and slice sampling. Out of these three, the slice sampling technique is simpler to implement and can adapt to the characteristics of the target pdf, making it suitable for automated use and software development. It can also be concluded from our experiments that slice sampling, in conjunction with the histogram method, can be slightly faster than MH and hybrid MH sampling methods for a particular case, as shown in the comparative table in Section V of this manuscript.","PeriodicalId":252801,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (ICARES)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (ICARES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARES56907.2022.9993594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimating the range for a Passive Bistatic Radar (PBR) is a critical problem for the signal processing research community. An efficient solution to this problem, in terms of time-complexity and estimation accuracy, has been proposed recently. This solution implemented maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), a classical technique, using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to maximize the likelihood function. Specifically, the hybrid Metropolis-Hastings (MH) MCMC method was used. In our study, we adopt the Bayesian framework to solve this problem in which the parameters of interest are considered random variables instead of unknown deterministic constants as in classical approaches. The Bayesian model accounts for the inherent randomness of the PBR system. It also incorporates prior knowledge about the parameter to be estimated into the estimator. This improves the estimation accuracy. Bayesian techniques are comparatively less computationally expensive for high-dimensional and multi-modal problems like PBR. To compute the global maximum of the target probability distribution function (pdf), we have chosen three MCMC methods, namely, MH, hybrid MH, and slice sampling. Out of these three, the slice sampling technique is simpler to implement and can adapt to the characteristics of the target pdf, making it suitable for automated use and software development. It can also be concluded from our experiments that slice sampling, in conjunction with the histogram method, can be slightly faster than MH and hybrid MH sampling methods for a particular case, as shown in the comparative table in Section V of this manuscript.
基于直方图切片采样的被动双基地雷达贝叶斯距离自动估计
无源双基地雷达(PBR)的距离估计是信号处理研究领域的一个关键问题。在时间复杂度和估计精度方面,最近提出了一种有效的解决方案。该方案实现了极大似然估计(MLE)这一经典技术,利用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法最大化似然函数。具体而言,采用了Metropolis-Hastings (MH)混合MCMC方法。在我们的研究中,我们采用贝叶斯框架来解决这个问题,其中感兴趣的参数被认为是随机变量,而不是像经典方法那样未知的确定性常数。贝叶斯模型解释了PBR系统固有的随机性。它还将关于待估计参数的先验知识纳入到估计器中。这提高了估计的准确性。对于像PBR这样的高维和多模态问题,贝叶斯技术的计算成本相对较低。为了计算目标概率分布函数(pdf)的全局最大值,我们选择了三种MCMC方法,即MH、混合MH和切片抽样。在这三种方法中,切片采样技术更容易实现,并且可以适应目标pdf的特性,使其适合自动化使用和软件开发。从我们的实验中也可以得出结论,在特定情况下,切片采样结合直方图方法可以比MH和混合MH采样方法略快,如本文第五节的比较表所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信