Comparison of Five Numerical Simulation Algorithms in Temperature Prediction for Hollow Microspheres in Magnetic Induction Hyperthermia

Yandong Zhang, Xianwen Zhang, Liyan Zhang, Jintian Tang
{"title":"Comparison of Five Numerical Simulation Algorithms in Temperature Prediction for Hollow Microspheres in Magnetic Induction Hyperthermia","authors":"Yandong Zhang, Xianwen Zhang, Liyan Zhang, Jintian Tang","doi":"10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2018.8633156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnetic induction hyperthermia (MIH) uses high temperatures beyond 42°C to kill cancer cells. The temperature simulation is an essential part of the hyperthermia planning system. Pre-temperature simulations can help doctors decide the amount and the position of the magnetic agents. Most papers focus on only one numerical heat transfer algorithm to simulate temperature changes in MIH. They usually use software like FLUENT to calculate the temperature variation. Nevertheless, in practice, the core calculation code needs to be written by ourselves, combined with tumor model from CT images. We need to decide which heat transfer algorithm has the practical results. In this paper, we focus on the different forms of FDM. We use five heat transfer algorithms including the explicit format of FDM, Peaceman-Rachford ADI, Brian ADI, Douglas ADI and FVM to simulate. The results of simulations show that the approximations in FDM and FVM lead to relatively large offset compared with other simulations. In addition, the difference between the results of simulations and experiments is caused by the heat power used in simulations, the inaccuracy of physical parameters and measurement error.","PeriodicalId":117227,"journal":{"name":"2018 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","volume":"606 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2018.8633156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Magnetic induction hyperthermia (MIH) uses high temperatures beyond 42°C to kill cancer cells. The temperature simulation is an essential part of the hyperthermia planning system. Pre-temperature simulations can help doctors decide the amount and the position of the magnetic agents. Most papers focus on only one numerical heat transfer algorithm to simulate temperature changes in MIH. They usually use software like FLUENT to calculate the temperature variation. Nevertheless, in practice, the core calculation code needs to be written by ourselves, combined with tumor model from CT images. We need to decide which heat transfer algorithm has the practical results. In this paper, we focus on the different forms of FDM. We use five heat transfer algorithms including the explicit format of FDM, Peaceman-Rachford ADI, Brian ADI, Douglas ADI and FVM to simulate. The results of simulations show that the approximations in FDM and FVM lead to relatively large offset compared with other simulations. In addition, the difference between the results of simulations and experiments is caused by the heat power used in simulations, the inaccuracy of physical parameters and measurement error.
五种数值模拟算法在空心微球磁感应热疗温度预测中的比较
磁感应热疗(MIH)使用超过42°C的高温来杀死癌细胞。温度模拟是热疗计划系统的重要组成部分。预温模拟可以帮助医生决定磁性试剂的数量和位置。大多数论文只关注一种数值传热算法来模拟MIH中的温度变化。他们通常使用FLUENT这样的软件来计算温度变化。但在实际操作中,核心计算代码需要我们自己编写,并结合CT图像中的肿瘤模型。我们需要确定哪种传热算法具有实际效果。在本文中,我们重点讨论了FDM的不同形式。采用FDM显式格式、Peaceman-Rachford ADI、Brian ADI、Douglas ADI和FVM五种换热算法进行模拟。仿真结果表明,与其他仿真相比,FDM和FVM中的近似导致了较大的偏移。此外,模拟结果与实验结果的差异主要是由于模拟时使用的热功率、物理参数的不准确性和测量误差造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信