A robust approach to the missile defence location problem

Axel A. F. Bloemen, L. Evers, A. I. Barros, H. Monsuur, A. Wagelmans
{"title":"A robust approach to the missile defence location problem","authors":"Axel A. F. Bloemen, L. Evers, A. I. Barros, H. Monsuur, A. Wagelmans","doi":"10.1504/IJIDSS.2011.039546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a model for determining a robust defence strategy against ballistic missile threat. Our approach takes into account a variety of possible future scenarios and different forms of robustness criteria, including the well-known absolute robustness criterion. We consider two problem variants. In the first, the number of ballistic missile interceptor systems is minimised, such that a predetermined defence level is achieved. In the second variant, the defence level is maximised for a given number of available interceptor systems. The solutions of both variants consist of a subset of all possible locations of the interceptor systems. We applied two solution approaches to this problem: a heuristic and an exact solution method. The heuristic method is based on simulated annealing and produces good results within a short amount of computation time. We also developed an integer programming formulation which can be solved to optimality using a standard solver. The computation time is higher, but because of the nice properties of the proposed IP-formulation, it can still be solved within reasonable amount of computation time. These two solution approaches were tested using a fictive, but realistic dataset. The results illustrate the effects of the predetermined defence levels and the availability of interceptor systems, as well as the robustness of the solutions produced. Finally, we used our dataset to illustrate the differences between both variants and their use in practice.","PeriodicalId":311979,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Intell. Def. Support Syst.","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Intell. Def. Support Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDSS.2011.039546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper proposes a model for determining a robust defence strategy against ballistic missile threat. Our approach takes into account a variety of possible future scenarios and different forms of robustness criteria, including the well-known absolute robustness criterion. We consider two problem variants. In the first, the number of ballistic missile interceptor systems is minimised, such that a predetermined defence level is achieved. In the second variant, the defence level is maximised for a given number of available interceptor systems. The solutions of both variants consist of a subset of all possible locations of the interceptor systems. We applied two solution approaches to this problem: a heuristic and an exact solution method. The heuristic method is based on simulated annealing and produces good results within a short amount of computation time. We also developed an integer programming formulation which can be solved to optimality using a standard solver. The computation time is higher, but because of the nice properties of the proposed IP-formulation, it can still be solved within reasonable amount of computation time. These two solution approaches were tested using a fictive, but realistic dataset. The results illustrate the effects of the predetermined defence levels and the availability of interceptor systems, as well as the robustness of the solutions produced. Finally, we used our dataset to illustrate the differences between both variants and their use in practice.
导弹防御定位问题的一种鲁棒方法
本文提出了一个确定针对弹道导弹威胁的稳健防御战略的模型。我们的方法考虑了各种可能的未来情景和不同形式的稳健性标准,包括众所周知的绝对稳健性标准。我们考虑两个问题变体。在第一种方案中,弹道导弹拦截系统的数量被最小化,从而达到预定的防御水平。在第二种变体中,对于给定数量的可用拦截系统,防御水平是最大化的。这两个变量的解都包含拦截系统所有可能位置的子集。我们对这个问题采用了两种求解方法:启发式和精确解法。启发式方法基于模拟退火,在较短的计算时间内取得了较好的结果。我们还开发了一个整数规划公式,它可以用标准求解器求解到最优性。计算时间较高,但由于所提出的ip公式的良好性质,它仍然可以在合理的计算时间内解决。这两种解决方案的方法使用一个真实的数据集进行了测试。结果说明了预定防御水平和拦截系统的可用性的影响,以及所产生的解决方案的鲁棒性。最后,我们使用我们的数据集来说明两种变体之间的差异及其在实践中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信