{"title":"楊德昌的殉道英雄與歷史反思:重看《牯嶺街少年殺人事件》","authors":"謝世宗 謝世宗","doi":"10.53106/2306036020201200360007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 楊德昌的《牯嶺街少年殺人事件》(1991)由於研究材料取得上的困難,二十五年來的研究論文仍然相當有限。不同於形式分析、女性主義、後殖民理論與心理分析的角度,本文以新批評的細讀與敘事學的方法,釐清電影如何透過角色的類比與對比,包含政治的現實主義者、道德的理想主義者與勢利的弄權者之間的妥協與衝突,在舞臺上架構出一齣殉道者的道德悲劇。其次,透過《牯嶺街》作為一部歷史電影,脈絡化上述的人物角色與道德衝突,探討1960年代的國家機器如何形塑了一群道德的理想主義者,而他們理想主義又為何必然與整個時代產生矛盾與衝突。\n Due to its inconvenient access, Edward Yang’s masterpiece A Brighter Summer Day, for the past twenty five years, has ellicited very few research articles. To make a contribution to this premature scholarship, this article focuses on the subject matter of the film and employes the method of narratology to argue that through the devices of similarity and contrast, Yang presents an ambitious moral tragedy on the cinematic stage where the heros attempt to realize their moral ideals even at the cost of their inclinations, self-interests and lives. Viewing the film as Yang’s historical reflection on the 1960s, the article then unravel the ways by which the state apparatuse interpellates some individuals into moral subjects and explicate why these moral idealists are doomed to confront and conflict with the millieu. \n \n","PeriodicalId":243831,"journal":{"name":"中正漢學研究","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中正漢學研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/2306036020201200360007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
楊德昌的《牯嶺街少年殺人事件》(1991)由於研究材料取得上的困難,二十五年來的研究論文仍然相當有限。不同於形式分析、女性主義、後殖民理論與心理分析的角度,本文以新批評的細讀與敘事學的方法,釐清電影如何透過角色的類比與對比,包含政治的現實主義者、道德的理想主義者與勢利的弄權者之間的妥協與衝突,在舞臺上架構出一齣殉道者的道德悲劇。其次,透過《牯嶺街》作為一部歷史電影,脈絡化上述的人物角色與道德衝突,探討1960年代的國家機器如何形塑了一群道德的理想主義者,而他們理想主義又為何必然與整個時代產生矛盾與衝突。
Due to its inconvenient access, Edward Yang’s masterpiece A Brighter Summer Day, for the past twenty five years, has ellicited very few research articles. To make a contribution to this premature scholarship, this article focuses on the subject matter of the film and employes the method of narratology to argue that through the devices of similarity and contrast, Yang presents an ambitious moral tragedy on the cinematic stage where the heros attempt to realize their moral ideals even at the cost of their inclinations, self-interests and lives. Viewing the film as Yang’s historical reflection on the 1960s, the article then unravel the ways by which the state apparatuse interpellates some individuals into moral subjects and explicate why these moral idealists are doomed to confront and conflict with the millieu.
杨德昌的《牯岭街少年杀人事件》(1991)由于研究材料取得上的困难,二十五年来的研究论文仍然相当有限。不同于形式分析、女性主义、后殖民理论与心理分析的角度,本文以新批评的细读与叙事学的方法,厘清电影如何透过角色的类比与对比,包含政治的现实主义者、道德的理想主义者与势利的弄权者之间的妥协与冲突,在舞台上架构出一出殉道者的道德悲剧。其次,透过《牯岭街》作为一部历史电影,脉络化上述的人物角色与道德冲突,探讨1960年代的国家机器如何形塑了一群道德的理想主义者,而他们理想主义又为何必然与整个时代产生矛盾与冲突。 Due to its inconvenient access, Edward Yang’s masterpiece A Brighter Summer Day, for the past twenty five years, has ellicited very few research articles. To make a contribution to this premature scholarship, this article focuses on the subject matter of the film and employes the method of narratology to argue that through the devices of similarity and contrast, Yang presents an ambitious moral tragedy on the cinematic stage where the heros attempt to realize their moral ideals even at the cost of their inclinations, self-interests and lives. Viewing the film as Yang’s historical reflection on the 1960s, the article then unravel the ways by which the state apparatuse interpellates some individuals into moral subjects and explicate why these moral idealists are doomed to confront and conflict with the millieu.