Comparison between intravenous dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin infusions for induced hypotension in patients undergoing vertebral fixation surgeries

M. Khalifa, R. Ammar, A. Elshafie
{"title":"Comparison between intravenous dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin infusions for induced hypotension in patients undergoing vertebral fixation surgeries","authors":"M. Khalifa, R. Ammar, A. Elshafie","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_17_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In vertebral fixation surgeries, patients lose a lot of blood during the course of surgery. This could result in severe patient complications during and after surgery. This also makes surgical visualization in the bloody field difficult and the duration of surgery more prolonged. With the new anesthetic agents, drugs, and monitoring techniques, this problem has been addressed. Controlled hypotension is defined as a reduction in systolic blood pressure to 80–90 mmHg, a reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) to 60–70 mmHg or by 30% of the baseline. Controlled hypotension is a commonly used technique to limit blood loss and improve visualization of the operative field during vertebral fixation surgery. Objective To compare the effects of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and nitroglycerin (NTG) on intraoperative hemodynamics, amount of blood loss, speed of recovery from hypotension after cessation of infusion, and postoperative complications. Subjective This study was carried out on 50 adult patients of both sexes, American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II, admitted to Alexandria Main University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery for elective spinal fixation surgeries (by the same surgical team) under general anesthesia. Results The results of the present study showed that arterial blood pressure in group I DEX at baseline (before induction of anesthesia) was 87.32±6.11 and increases significantly after 10 min from 20 to 80 min. The MAP was significantly decreased in group I at 90 min till the end of follow-up; there was no significant change in MAP from the baseline, while in group II ‘NTG.’ Comparing the two studied groups regarding MAP at different periods of follow-up, it was found that there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding MAP all over the period of follow-up. Conclusion NTG and DEX could induce hypotension, but DEX showed a more favorable hemodynamic profile as regards blood pressure and heart rate. DEX also showed a shorter duration of surgery with less blood loss and less blood transfusion.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_17_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In vertebral fixation surgeries, patients lose a lot of blood during the course of surgery. This could result in severe patient complications during and after surgery. This also makes surgical visualization in the bloody field difficult and the duration of surgery more prolonged. With the new anesthetic agents, drugs, and monitoring techniques, this problem has been addressed. Controlled hypotension is defined as a reduction in systolic blood pressure to 80–90 mmHg, a reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) to 60–70 mmHg or by 30% of the baseline. Controlled hypotension is a commonly used technique to limit blood loss and improve visualization of the operative field during vertebral fixation surgery. Objective To compare the effects of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and nitroglycerin (NTG) on intraoperative hemodynamics, amount of blood loss, speed of recovery from hypotension after cessation of infusion, and postoperative complications. Subjective This study was carried out on 50 adult patients of both sexes, American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II, admitted to Alexandria Main University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery for elective spinal fixation surgeries (by the same surgical team) under general anesthesia. Results The results of the present study showed that arterial blood pressure in group I DEX at baseline (before induction of anesthesia) was 87.32±6.11 and increases significantly after 10 min from 20 to 80 min. The MAP was significantly decreased in group I at 90 min till the end of follow-up; there was no significant change in MAP from the baseline, while in group II ‘NTG.’ Comparing the two studied groups regarding MAP at different periods of follow-up, it was found that there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding MAP all over the period of follow-up. Conclusion NTG and DEX could induce hypotension, but DEX showed a more favorable hemodynamic profile as regards blood pressure and heart rate. DEX also showed a shorter duration of surgery with less blood loss and less blood transfusion.
右美托咪定静脉滴注与硝酸甘油在椎体固定术中诱导低血压的比较
背景在椎体固定手术中,患者在手术过程中会大量失血。这可能导致患者在手术期间和手术后出现严重的并发症。这也使得手术在血液区的可视化变得困难,并且延长了手术时间。随着新的麻醉剂、药物和监测技术的出现,这个问题已经得到了解决。控制性低血压的定义是收缩压降至80-90 mmHg,平均动脉压(MAP)降至60-70 mmHg或基线的30%。在椎体固定手术中,控制性低血压是一种常用的技术,以限制失血量和提高手术视野的可视性。目的比较右美托咪定(DEX)与硝酸甘油(NTG)静脉滴注对术中血流动力学、失血量、停注后低血压恢复速度及术后并发症的影响。本研究的对象是在亚历山大大学附属医院神经外科(同一手术组)接受全麻下择期脊柱固定手术的50例男女成年患者,均为美国麻醉师学会I、II分会会员。结果本研究结果显示,ⅰ组患者基线(麻醉前)动脉血压为87.32±6.11,20 ~ 80 min后10 min明显升高。1组在随访结束前90 min MAP明显降低;与基线相比,MAP没有显著变化,而在第二组的NTG中。比较两组在不同随访时期的MAP,发现两组在整个随访期间的MAP没有显著差异。结论NTG和DEX均可诱导低血压,但DEX在血压和心率方面表现出更有利的血流动力学特征。DEX还显示手术时间短,出血量少,输血量少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信