Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties of Bio Self Cured Concrete and Conventionally Cured Concrete

R. Malathy, M. Geetha
{"title":"Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties of Bio Self Cured Concrete and Conventionally Cured Concrete","authors":"R. Malathy, M. Geetha","doi":"10.21276/IJEE.2017.10.0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focusing on the usage of biomaterials as self-curing agents in concrete. Biomaterials like Calatropis Gigantea (CG) and Spinacea Oleracia (SO) are found to be equivalent to the existing chemical admixture Polyethylene Glycol since they have specific characteristic of holding water and releasing whenever it is needed as internal reservoirs like self-curing agents and their microstructural properties are resembling Polyethylene Glycol. From the previous studies, it was found that these biomaterials of a small quantity of about less than 1% by weight of cement performing better than PEG and found to be cost effective and no need of water curing of the day one of concreting and achieving the required strength 9-13. This paper discusses on the strength development of self-cured concrete using above said biomaterials at the age of 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 56 days without water curing and compared with the performance of conventional water cured concrete specimen. Also splitting tensile strength and flexural strength of both concrete at 28 days were determined and compared. From the results, it is found that Spinacea Oleracia is performing better than CG and PEG.","PeriodicalId":344962,"journal":{"name":"International journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering","volume":"2000 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/IJEE.2017.10.0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper focusing on the usage of biomaterials as self-curing agents in concrete. Biomaterials like Calatropis Gigantea (CG) and Spinacea Oleracia (SO) are found to be equivalent to the existing chemical admixture Polyethylene Glycol since they have specific characteristic of holding water and releasing whenever it is needed as internal reservoirs like self-curing agents and their microstructural properties are resembling Polyethylene Glycol. From the previous studies, it was found that these biomaterials of a small quantity of about less than 1% by weight of cement performing better than PEG and found to be cost effective and no need of water curing of the day one of concreting and achieving the required strength 9-13. This paper discusses on the strength development of self-cured concrete using above said biomaterials at the age of 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 56 days without water curing and compared with the performance of conventional water cured concrete specimen. Also splitting tensile strength and flexural strength of both concrete at 28 days were determined and compared. From the results, it is found that Spinacea Oleracia is performing better than CG and PEG.
生物自养护混凝土与常规养护混凝土力学性能的比较研究
本文主要研究了生物材料作为自固化剂在混凝土中的应用。像Calatropis Gigantea (CG)和Spinacea Oleracia (SO)这样的生物材料被发现相当于现有的化学混合物聚乙二醇,因为它们具有像自固化剂一样的内部储水和释放水的特定特性,并且它们的微观结构性质类似于聚乙二醇。从之前的研究中发现,这些少量的生物材料(约占水泥重量的1%)的性能优于PEG,并且具有成本效益,并且在混凝土的第一天不需要水养护,达到所需的强度9-13。本文讨论了上述生物材料在无水养护3、7、14、21、28和56天龄期自养护混凝土的强度发展情况,并与常规水养护混凝土试件的性能进行了比较。测定并比较了两种混凝土28d的劈裂抗拉强度和抗弯强度。从实验结果来看,绿刺的性能优于CG和PEG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信