William Carleton’s and Charles Kickham’s Ethnographic Realism

Mary L. Mullen
{"title":"William Carleton’s and Charles Kickham’s Ethnographic Realism","authors":"Mary L. Mullen","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474453240.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on William Carleton and Charles Joseph Kickham, two Irish writers who received critical and popular acclaim for their truthful portrayals of Irish life in the nineteenth century but are understood as ethnographic rather than realist writers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Questioning this distinction between realism and ethnography by studying narrative metalepsis within their novels, the chapter argues that both Carleton and Kickham demonstrate how institutions imagine a future that depends upon forgetting. Remembering what institutions work to forget, the politically conservative Carleton legitimates traditional practices that institutions seek to root out while Kickham, a Fenian who advocated revolution, cultivates an anti-institutional and anti-English political stance.","PeriodicalId":183109,"journal":{"name":"Novel Institutions","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novel Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474453240.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter focuses on William Carleton and Charles Joseph Kickham, two Irish writers who received critical and popular acclaim for their truthful portrayals of Irish life in the nineteenth century but are understood as ethnographic rather than realist writers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Questioning this distinction between realism and ethnography by studying narrative metalepsis within their novels, the chapter argues that both Carleton and Kickham demonstrate how institutions imagine a future that depends upon forgetting. Remembering what institutions work to forget, the politically conservative Carleton legitimates traditional practices that institutions seek to root out while Kickham, a Fenian who advocated revolution, cultivates an anti-institutional and anti-English political stance.
威廉·卡尔顿和查尔斯·基克汉姆的民族现实主义
本章主要关注威廉·卡尔顿和查尔斯·约瑟夫·基克汉姆,这两位爱尔兰作家因其对19世纪爱尔兰生活的真实描绘而获得了评论界和大众的赞誉,但在20世纪和21世纪,他们被理解为民族志作家,而不是现实主义作家。通过研究他们小说中的叙事幻觉,质疑现实主义和民族志之间的区别,本章认为,卡尔顿和基克汉姆都展示了制度如何想象一个依赖于遗忘的未来。在政治上保守的卡尔顿铭记制度是为了遗忘而努力的,他将制度试图根除的传统做法合法化,而倡导革命的芬尼亚人基克汉姆则培养了一种反制度、反英国的政治立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信