Assessing Score Dependability of West Africa Examination Council (WAEC) 2019 Mathematics Objective Test Using Generalisability Theory

Imasuen K., Stanley O.E.
{"title":"Assessing Score Dependability of West Africa Examination Council (WAEC) 2019 Mathematics Objective Test Using Generalisability Theory","authors":"Imasuen K., Stanley O.E.","doi":"10.52589/bjce-oca9ozjt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated score dependability in the 2019 West Africa Examination Council (WAEC) Senior Secondary School examination using the generalisability theory. The study was specifically concerned with identifying and analysing the score dependability of the Senior Secondary School 2019 WAEC mathematics objective examination using generalisability theory, and determining the highest contribution of facets: students, items and teachers to score dependability. Two research questions were raised to guide the study. The study was a survey which adopted a random effect two-facet fully crossed s×r×i design for generalisability (G) and decision (D) studies. The population consisted of fifty-six thousand, seven hundred and ninety-seven (5697) Senior Secondary three (SS3) students in the seventy-five (75) public secondary schools in Benin Metropolis for the 2019/2020 academic session. The instrument for data collection was a fifty (50) multiple choice WAEC, Mathematics 2019 examination. The instrument had been validated by the West African Examination Council (WAEC). The reliability of the items was ascertained using the Kuder – Richardson 20 (KR 20) to obtain internal consistency. It gave a value of 0.92. Data collected were analysed using the software EduG version 6.0-e based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) and generalisability. The findings which emerged from the study were the highest effects to score dependability in examination came from the interaction of students and teachers, an index of dependability (∅)of 0.92 high enough to maximise reliability was observed only when the teachers were increased to 78. Based on the findings, it was recommended that generalisability analysis should be carried out by researchers, test developers and examination bodies so as to reduce or eliminate measurement error and hence maximise reliability, and there should be enough invigilators when conducting examinations, thereby minimising error and maximising reliability (dependability) of examination scores.","PeriodicalId":414127,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Contemporary Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Contemporary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52589/bjce-oca9ozjt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated score dependability in the 2019 West Africa Examination Council (WAEC) Senior Secondary School examination using the generalisability theory. The study was specifically concerned with identifying and analysing the score dependability of the Senior Secondary School 2019 WAEC mathematics objective examination using generalisability theory, and determining the highest contribution of facets: students, items and teachers to score dependability. Two research questions were raised to guide the study. The study was a survey which adopted a random effect two-facet fully crossed s×r×i design for generalisability (G) and decision (D) studies. The population consisted of fifty-six thousand, seven hundred and ninety-seven (5697) Senior Secondary three (SS3) students in the seventy-five (75) public secondary schools in Benin Metropolis for the 2019/2020 academic session. The instrument for data collection was a fifty (50) multiple choice WAEC, Mathematics 2019 examination. The instrument had been validated by the West African Examination Council (WAEC). The reliability of the items was ascertained using the Kuder – Richardson 20 (KR 20) to obtain internal consistency. It gave a value of 0.92. Data collected were analysed using the software EduG version 6.0-e based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) and generalisability. The findings which emerged from the study were the highest effects to score dependability in examination came from the interaction of students and teachers, an index of dependability (∅)of 0.92 high enough to maximise reliability was observed only when the teachers were increased to 78. Based on the findings, it was recommended that generalisability analysis should be carried out by researchers, test developers and examination bodies so as to reduce or eliminate measurement error and hence maximise reliability, and there should be enough invigilators when conducting examinations, thereby minimising error and maximising reliability (dependability) of examination scores.
利用概率性理论评估西非考试委员会(WAEC) 2019年数学目标考试的分数可靠性
本研究使用概率性理论调查了2019年西非考试委员会(WAEC)高中考试的分数可靠性。本研究利用概率性理论识别和分析了2019年高中WAEC数学客观考试的分数可靠性,并确定了学生、项目和教师等方面对分数可靠性的最大贡献。提出了两个研究问题来指导研究。该研究是一项采用随机效应双面完全交叉s×r×i设计的调查,用于概括性(G)和决策(D)研究。在2019/2020学年期间,人口包括贝宁大都市七十五所公立中学的五万六千七百九十七(5697)名高中三(SS3)学生。数据收集的工具是一个50(50)的选择题WAEC,数学2019考试。该文书已得到西非考试委员会的认可。采用库德-理查德森20 (KR - 20)量表来确定项目的信度,以获得内部一致性。它的值为0.92。采用EduG version 6.0-e软件进行方差分析(ANOVA)和通用性分析。从研究中得出的结果是,学生和老师的互动对考试可靠性得分的影响最大,可信度指数(∅)为0.92,足以使可靠性最大化,只有当教师增加到78时才观察到。根据研究结果,建议由研究人员、考试开发人员和考试机构进行普遍性分析,以减少或消除测量误差,从而最大限度地提高可靠性,并在进行考试时配备足够的监考人员,从而最大限度地减少误差,提高考试分数的可靠性(可靠性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信