(Re-)Imagining Neighbourhood Spaces from a Transdisciplinary, Inclusive Research Perspective: The Vaartkom Case

H. Vrebos, G. Bianchi, Ziloy Croughs, E. Descheemaeker, A.R.B. Mier, A. A. Pacific, A. Van Der Stighelen, M. Van Espen, L. Wirla, K. Hermans, K. Hannes
{"title":"(Re-)Imagining Neighbourhood Spaces from a Transdisciplinary, Inclusive Research Perspective: The Vaartkom Case","authors":"H. Vrebos, G. Bianchi, Ziloy Croughs, E. Descheemaeker, A.R.B. Mier, A. A. Pacific, A. Van Der Stighelen, M. Van Espen, L. Wirla, K. Hermans, K. Hannes","doi":"10.11116/tdi2021.5.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cities and dense urban areas are dynamic environments, always adapting to changing circumstances and shocks, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The Vaartkom (or the Canal Bowl in English), a neighbourhood in Leuven, provides an interesting case study, having undergone a drastic transformation\n in the past two decades from a dilapidated industrial zone to mixed neighbourhood and cultural hotspot. This has introduced renewed and ongoing community dynamics, which inevitably influences the use of public and private space in the neighbourhood, creating new areas for inclusion and exclusion.\n This threefold transdisciplinary research focuses first on the spatial dynamics on the level of public space under COVID-19 as part of a wider series of neighbourhood dynamics. Second, it dives into the aspect of inclusive environments and third, it uses the transdisciplinary research process\n to reflect on a meta-level. Employing various methods – such as interviews, site visits, stakeholder and physical mapping exercises, we worked with community members to explore these spatial dynamics. Our findings highlight the conflicting expectations about the present and future use\n of public space. These opposing opinions reveal the tensions that exist among community members about how public spaces are used and whom they are for. This suggests there are multiple understandings of the Vaartkom. These multiple understandings were drawn from responses collected during\n a public engagement activity, which were subsequently analysed in a thematic and spatial way. This analysis brought forward influences of a temporal and spatial nature – that is, we acknowledge that the selected locations at which we engaged with community members, and the time of day,\n played a role in who we reached in the community and the responses we collected. This highlights the degree of awareness and participatory effort required to be truly inclusive. We therefore pro pose that future engagements involve the creation of a \"Third Sphere\" – a space for open,\n transparent and neutral dialogue – allowing the opportunity not only to imagine a collective future, but also to build bridges and help community members feel heard and empowered to contribute to the creation of a more inclusive post-COVID-19 environment.","PeriodicalId":316049,"journal":{"name":"Transdisciplinary Insights","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transdisciplinary Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11116/tdi2021.5.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities and dense urban areas are dynamic environments, always adapting to changing circumstances and shocks, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The Vaartkom (or the Canal Bowl in English), a neighbourhood in Leuven, provides an interesting case study, having undergone a drastic transformation in the past two decades from a dilapidated industrial zone to mixed neighbourhood and cultural hotspot. This has introduced renewed and ongoing community dynamics, which inevitably influences the use of public and private space in the neighbourhood, creating new areas for inclusion and exclusion. This threefold transdisciplinary research focuses first on the spatial dynamics on the level of public space under COVID-19 as part of a wider series of neighbourhood dynamics. Second, it dives into the aspect of inclusive environments and third, it uses the transdisciplinary research process to reflect on a meta-level. Employing various methods – such as interviews, site visits, stakeholder and physical mapping exercises, we worked with community members to explore these spatial dynamics. Our findings highlight the conflicting expectations about the present and future use of public space. These opposing opinions reveal the tensions that exist among community members about how public spaces are used and whom they are for. This suggests there are multiple understandings of the Vaartkom. These multiple understandings were drawn from responses collected during a public engagement activity, which were subsequently analysed in a thematic and spatial way. This analysis brought forward influences of a temporal and spatial nature – that is, we acknowledge that the selected locations at which we engaged with community members, and the time of day, played a role in who we reached in the community and the responses we collected. This highlights the degree of awareness and participatory effort required to be truly inclusive. We therefore pro pose that future engagements involve the creation of a "Third Sphere" – a space for open, transparent and neutral dialogue – allowing the opportunity not only to imagine a collective future, but also to build bridges and help community members feel heard and empowered to contribute to the creation of a more inclusive post-COVID-19 environment.
(再)从跨学科、包容性的研究视角想象邻里空间:Vaartkom案例
城市和人口密集的城市地区是动态的环境,始终适应不断变化的环境和冲击,例如最近的COVID-19大流行。鲁汶的Vaartkom(英语为Canal Bowl)社区提供了一个有趣的案例研究,在过去的二十年里,它经历了从破败的工业区到混合社区和文化热点的巨大转变。这带来了更新和持续的社区动态,这不可避免地影响了社区公共和私人空间的使用,创造了新的包容和排斥区域。这项跨学科的三重研究首先侧重于2019冠状病毒病下公共空间层面的空间动态,作为更广泛的一系列社区动态的一部分。第二,深入包容性环境的层面;第三,运用跨学科的研究过程,在元层面进行反思。我们采用各种方法,如访谈、实地考察、利益相关者和物理测绘练习,与社区成员一起探索这些空间动态。我们的研究结果强调了对当前和未来公共空间使用的相互矛盾的期望。这些对立的意见揭示了社区成员之间关于如何使用公共空间以及它们是为谁服务的紧张关系。这表明对Vaartkom有多种理解。这些多重理解是从公众参与活动中收集的反馈中得出的,随后以主题和空间的方式进行分析。这一分析提出了时间和空间性质的影响——也就是说,我们承认,我们与社区成员接触的选定地点和一天中的时间,对我们在社区中接触到的人以及我们收集到的回应起了作用。这突出了真正具有包容性所需的认识和参与努力的程度。因此,我们建议,未来的参与包括创建“第三领域”——一个开放、透明和中立的对话空间——不仅让人们有机会想象一个共同的未来,而且还能建立桥梁,帮助社区成员感到自己被倾听,并有能力为创建一个更具包容性的后covid -19环境做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信