The Comparison of Different Types of Instruments on Nanoparticle Size Measurements through Interlaboratory Comparisons 

Hsiu-lin Lin
{"title":"The Comparison of Different Types of Instruments on Nanoparticle Size Measurements through Interlaboratory Comparisons ","authors":"Hsiu-lin Lin","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several techniques for measuring and characterizing the nanoparticle sizes. However, these measurement results for same nanoparticles may deviate from each other at an amount that is considered significant. To establish the effectiveness and comparability of measurement methods on nanoparticles, the Center for Measurement Standards of Industrial Technology Research Institute (CMS/ITRI) conducted three inter laboratory comparisons on nano particle size measurements in 2005, 2006 and 2012. In 2005, an APEC-led preliminary inter laboratory comparison on nanoparticle size characterization was carried out among 10 laboratories from 6 economies. In 2006, the interlaboratory comparison was carried out for the second time with a more focused objective of detailing instrument-specific measurement instructions for enhancing the comparability among different types of measurement methods. There were 16 laboratories from 10 economies participating in that comparison. In 2012, to harmonize the measurement techniques and capabilities on nanoparticle size, an APMP supplementary comparison was held among 14 national measurement laboratories. In this paper, statistical analysis was carried out to identify that the nanoparticle size measured from Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) was generally larger than the sizes measured from other measurement techniques including Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Atomic Force Microcopy(AFM), Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA), and Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS).","PeriodicalId":432978,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several techniques for measuring and characterizing the nanoparticle sizes. However, these measurement results for same nanoparticles may deviate from each other at an amount that is considered significant. To establish the effectiveness and comparability of measurement methods on nanoparticles, the Center for Measurement Standards of Industrial Technology Research Institute (CMS/ITRI) conducted three inter laboratory comparisons on nano particle size measurements in 2005, 2006 and 2012. In 2005, an APEC-led preliminary inter laboratory comparison on nanoparticle size characterization was carried out among 10 laboratories from 6 economies. In 2006, the interlaboratory comparison was carried out for the second time with a more focused objective of detailing instrument-specific measurement instructions for enhancing the comparability among different types of measurement methods. There were 16 laboratories from 10 economies participating in that comparison. In 2012, to harmonize the measurement techniques and capabilities on nanoparticle size, an APMP supplementary comparison was held among 14 national measurement laboratories. In this paper, statistical analysis was carried out to identify that the nanoparticle size measured from Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) was generally larger than the sizes measured from other measurement techniques including Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Atomic Force Microcopy(AFM), Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA), and Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS).
不同类型仪器在纳米颗粒尺寸测量上的实验室间比较
有几种技术用于测量和表征纳米颗粒的大小。然而,对于相同的纳米颗粒,这些测量结果可能在被认为是显著的量上彼此偏离。为了建立纳米颗粒测量方法的有效性和可比性,工业技术研究院测量标准中心于2005年、2006年和2012年进行了三次纳米颗粒尺寸测量的实验室间比较。2005年,由亚太经合组织牵头,在6个经济体的10个实验室中进行了纳米颗粒尺寸表征的初步实验室间比较。2006年,进行了第二次实验室间比较,目标更加集中,详细说明了特定仪器的测量说明,以增强不同类型测量方法之间的可比性。来自10个经济体的16个实验室参与了这项比较。2012年,为了协调纳米颗粒尺寸的测量技术和能力,在14个国家的测量实验室之间进行了APMP补充比较。本文通过统计分析发现,动态光散射(DLS)测量的纳米颗粒尺寸通常大于其他测量技术,包括透射电子显微镜(TEM)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、原子力显微镜(AFM)、差分迁移率分析仪(DMA)和小角度x射线散射(SAXS)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信