Towards a Typology of an Emergent Museum Form

Cheryl Klimaszeweski
{"title":"Towards a Typology of an Emergent Museum Form","authors":"Cheryl Klimaszeweski","doi":"10.57225/martor.2018.23.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal museums created by enthusiastic individual makers are becoming more visible on the cultural landscape. Recent scholarship studying examples of this emergent institutional form in Colombia, Estonia, Finland, Romania and Spain refer to these museums using a variety of terms, including: amateur, author, do-it-yourself, family, grassroots, local, naïve, personal, unofficial, vernacular and wild. Having studied this phenomenon since 2011, one challenging problem for me as a researcher has been: what do we call this kind of museum? Adding to the list of descriptors emergent museums, I employ Greg Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s (2003) work on metaphor theory to present an analysis of how these terms reflect different aspects of this phenomenon. Understood as knowledge institutions, these experimental spaces fosters ways of knowing that contrast with more traditional museum epistemologies, foregrounding knowledge-from-within; knowledge-making; and the individual-as-locus-of-knowledge. I share my experience visiting Cleo’s Ferry Museum and Nature Trail, a self-made, self-described museum in Melba, Idaho as a comparative analysis that connects notable experiential moments (captured in photographs) I have had in Romanian emergent museums to notable moments at Cleo’s. Connecting patterns of experiences across these spaces using personal examples illustrates the different ways of knowing emergent museums foster. In conclusion, I consider emergent museums as a new model of museum-making that are not simply anomalies or novelties; they provide an example of what all museums could be.","PeriodicalId":324681,"journal":{"name":"Martor. The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Martor. The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57225/martor.2018.23.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Personal museums created by enthusiastic individual makers are becoming more visible on the cultural landscape. Recent scholarship studying examples of this emergent institutional form in Colombia, Estonia, Finland, Romania and Spain refer to these museums using a variety of terms, including: amateur, author, do-it-yourself, family, grassroots, local, naïve, personal, unofficial, vernacular and wild. Having studied this phenomenon since 2011, one challenging problem for me as a researcher has been: what do we call this kind of museum? Adding to the list of descriptors emergent museums, I employ Greg Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s (2003) work on metaphor theory to present an analysis of how these terms reflect different aspects of this phenomenon. Understood as knowledge institutions, these experimental spaces fosters ways of knowing that contrast with more traditional museum epistemologies, foregrounding knowledge-from-within; knowledge-making; and the individual-as-locus-of-knowledge. I share my experience visiting Cleo’s Ferry Museum and Nature Trail, a self-made, self-described museum in Melba, Idaho as a comparative analysis that connects notable experiential moments (captured in photographs) I have had in Romanian emergent museums to notable moments at Cleo’s. Connecting patterns of experiences across these spaces using personal examples illustrates the different ways of knowing emergent museums foster. In conclusion, I consider emergent museums as a new model of museum-making that are not simply anomalies or novelties; they provide an example of what all museums could be.
走向新兴博物馆形式的类型学
在文化景观中,由热情的个人创作者创建的个人博物馆越来越引人注目。最近在哥伦比亚、爱沙尼亚、芬兰、罗马尼亚和西班牙研究这种新兴机构形式的学者使用各种术语来称呼这些博物馆,包括:业余、作者、自己动手、家庭、基层、当地、naïve、个人、非官方、地方和野生。自2011年开始研究这一现象以来,作为一名研究人员,我面临的一个具有挑战性的问题是:我们该如何称呼这种博物馆?在描述新兴博物馆的列表中,我引用了Greg Lakoff和Mark Johnson(2003)关于隐喻理论的研究,来分析这些术语如何反映这一现象的不同方面。作为知识机构,这些实验空间培养了与更传统的博物馆认识论形成对比的认识方式,强调内部知识;knowledge-making;个人作为知识的轨迹。我分享了我参观克莱奥渡轮博物馆和自然之路的经历,这是一个自制的、自我描述的博物馆,位于爱达荷州梅尔巴,作为一种比较分析,将我在罗马尼亚新兴博物馆的重要体验时刻(用照片捕捉到的)与克莱奥博物馆的重要时刻联系起来。通过个人例子将这些空间的体验模式联系起来,说明了了解新兴博物馆培养的不同方式。总之,我认为新兴博物馆是一种新的博物馆制作模式,它不仅仅是异常或新奇;它们为所有博物馆提供了一个榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信