Classification of Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability: A Machine Learning Approach for Data Clustering on Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

K. Tsoi, Max W. Y. Lam, Felix C. H. Chan, H. W. Hirai, Baker K. K. Bat, Samuel Y. S. Wong, H. Meng
{"title":"Classification of Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability: A Machine Learning Approach for Data Clustering on Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)","authors":"K. Tsoi, Max W. Y. Lam, Felix C. H. Chan, H. W. Hirai, Baker K. K. Bat, Samuel Y. S. Wong, H. Meng","doi":"10.1145/3079452.3079454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with the cardiovascular disease. However, there is no standard risk stratification method to evaluate BPV. Our study aims to cluster BPV into three levels, namely, low, medium and high levels, by a machine learning approach. Methods: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) dataset, which includes patients with hypertension or at risk of cardiovascular diseases, was obtained from a clinical data sharing platform. In the clinical trial, participants with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of at least 130 mmHg and an increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to receive intensive treatment (targeting SBP below 120 mmHg) or standard treatment (targeting SBP below 140 mmHg), and blood pressure (BP) were measured and recorded during the follow-up periods. Visit-to-visit BPV was measured by the deviation between the observed records and the personalized BP trends, and two-dimensional clustering on SBP and diastolic BP were applied. Different curve fitting techniques (linear regression and cubic regression) and clustering methods (K-means and Agglomerative Clustering) were attempted and compared with each other. Results: With 8,092 participants and a median follow-up of 3.26 years, linear regression was a simple and reliable method to capture the BP trend. K-means model showed stable data clustering results. Intensive treatment showed to be effective for participants with a high level of BPV. Conclusion: Machine learning can be used for data clustering on BPV.","PeriodicalId":245682,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3079452.3079454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with the cardiovascular disease. However, there is no standard risk stratification method to evaluate BPV. Our study aims to cluster BPV into three levels, namely, low, medium and high levels, by a machine learning approach. Methods: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) dataset, which includes patients with hypertension or at risk of cardiovascular diseases, was obtained from a clinical data sharing platform. In the clinical trial, participants with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of at least 130 mmHg and an increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to receive intensive treatment (targeting SBP below 120 mmHg) or standard treatment (targeting SBP below 140 mmHg), and blood pressure (BP) were measured and recorded during the follow-up periods. Visit-to-visit BPV was measured by the deviation between the observed records and the personalized BP trends, and two-dimensional clustering on SBP and diastolic BP were applied. Different curve fitting techniques (linear regression and cubic regression) and clustering methods (K-means and Agglomerative Clustering) were attempted and compared with each other. Results: With 8,092 participants and a median follow-up of 3.26 years, linear regression was a simple and reliable method to capture the BP trend. K-means model showed stable data clustering results. Intensive treatment showed to be effective for participants with a high level of BPV. Conclusion: Machine learning can be used for data clustering on BPV.
就诊间血压变异性分类:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)数据聚类的机器学习方法
背景:血压变异性(BPV)与心血管疾病相关。然而,目前尚无标准的风险分层方法来评价BPV。我们的研究旨在通过机器学习的方法将BPV分为低、中、高三个层次。方法:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)数据集,包括高血压或有心血管疾病风险的患者,从临床数据共享平台获得。在临床试验中,收缩压(SBP)至少为130 mmHg且心血管风险增加的参与者随机接受强化治疗(目标收缩压低于120 mmHg)或标准治疗(目标收缩压低于140 mmHg),并在随访期间测量和记录血压(BP)。通过观察记录与个性化血压趋势之间的偏差来测量每次就诊的BPV,并应用收缩压和舒张压的二维聚类。不同的曲线拟合技术(线性回归和三次回归)和聚类方法(K-means和Agglomerative clustering)进行了尝试和比较。结果:8092名参与者,中位随访3.26年,线性回归是一种简单可靠的方法来捕捉血压趋势。K-means模型显示了稳定的数据聚类结果。强化治疗显示对BPV水平高的参与者有效。结论:机器学习可以用于BPV的数据聚类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信