The Psychology of Speciesism

Kristof Dhont, Gordon Hodson, Ana C. Leite, Alina Salmen
{"title":"The Psychology of Speciesism","authors":"Kristof Dhont, Gordon Hodson, Ana C. Leite, Alina Salmen","doi":"10.4324/9781351181440-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being animals, humans distance themselves physically and mentally from (most) other animals and prioritize human interests. We exploit other animals to feed, clothe, and entertain ourselves, to name just a few animal exploitation practices. Such discrimination against other species, or speciesism, is the central focus of the present chapter. Drawing on recent scientific findings, we reveal the psychological connections between speciesism and prejudices such as racism and sexism. Those who support animal exploitation also tend to endorse sexist and racist views and rely on the belief in group dominance and human supremacy to justify systems of inequality and oppression. The common denominator is that the interests of disadvantaged groups like animals, women, and ethnic minorities, are considered subordinate to the interests and privileges of advantaged groups like humans in general, and white men in particular. Although recognizing this intersectionality is critical to the understanding of human-animal relations, explicitly referring to such parallels in animal advocacy campaigns can be easily misunderstood, and may be ineffective or even counterproductive. We see value in experience- and behavior-based interventions where people learn to connect psychologically with animals to change their animal-relevant beliefs, and more generally, to broaden the mind and challenge exploitative societal traditions.","PeriodicalId":351658,"journal":{"name":"Why We Love and Exploit Animals","volume":"442 1-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Why We Love and Exploit Animals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351181440-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Despite being animals, humans distance themselves physically and mentally from (most) other animals and prioritize human interests. We exploit other animals to feed, clothe, and entertain ourselves, to name just a few animal exploitation practices. Such discrimination against other species, or speciesism, is the central focus of the present chapter. Drawing on recent scientific findings, we reveal the psychological connections between speciesism and prejudices such as racism and sexism. Those who support animal exploitation also tend to endorse sexist and racist views and rely on the belief in group dominance and human supremacy to justify systems of inequality and oppression. The common denominator is that the interests of disadvantaged groups like animals, women, and ethnic minorities, are considered subordinate to the interests and privileges of advantaged groups like humans in general, and white men in particular. Although recognizing this intersectionality is critical to the understanding of human-animal relations, explicitly referring to such parallels in animal advocacy campaigns can be easily misunderstood, and may be ineffective or even counterproductive. We see value in experience- and behavior-based interventions where people learn to connect psychologically with animals to change their animal-relevant beliefs, and more generally, to broaden the mind and challenge exploitative societal traditions.
物种主义心理学
尽管人类是动物,但人类在身体和精神上都与(大多数)其他动物保持距离,并优先考虑人类的利益。我们利用其他动物为自己提供食物、衣服和娱乐,这只是动物剥削行为的几个例子。这种对其他物种的歧视,或物种歧视,是本章的中心焦点。根据最近的科学发现,我们揭示了物种歧视与种族主义和性别歧视等偏见之间的心理联系。那些支持动物剥削的人也倾向于支持性别歧视和种族主义观点,并依靠群体统治和人类至上的信念来为不平等和压迫制度辩护。它们的共同点是,动物、女性和少数民族等弱势群体的利益被认为服从于人类等优势群体的利益和特权,尤其是白人男性。虽然认识到这种交叉性对于理解人类与动物的关系至关重要,但在动物保护运动中明确提及这种相似之处很容易被误解,可能无效甚至适得其反。我们看到了基于经验和行为的干预措施的价值,在这些干预措施中,人们学会从心理上与动物建立联系,以改变他们与动物有关的信念,更广泛地说,拓宽思维,挑战剥削性的社会传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信