Rethinking Civil-Military Relations in a Pakistan: Some Lessons from Turkey

Zhao Shurong, S. Rahman
{"title":"Rethinking Civil-Military Relations in a Pakistan: Some Lessons from Turkey","authors":"Zhao Shurong, S. Rahman","doi":"10.4172/2167-0358.1000209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pakistan and Turkey enjoy great similarities in many aspects. Yet, the greatest similarity among them is the history of military interventions in domestic politics. The elected governments have been overthrown by the militaries in both the countries, imposing martial laws intermittently. However, since its gaining power in 2002, the government of Justice and Development Party (AKP) has taken series of steps to re-balance Turkish civil-military relations in favour of elected government, which have proved successful in thwarting coup attempts by the country’s military. \nPakistan being a parliamentary democracy has no place for its military to indulge in domestic politics. However, Pakistan has remained under direct military rule for half of the country’s existence. For the remaining half, a fragile democracy existed with ominous threat of military rule. In this article, an attempt has been made to identify the causes of military’s intervention in domestic politics in Pakistan. Some parallels have been drawn to the transforming civil-military relations in Turkey, with a view to draw some pertinent lessons for Pakistan. This article suggests certain first and second-generation measures for democratic government in Pakistan for ensuring civilian supremacy in civil-military relations as enunciated by its constitution.","PeriodicalId":284611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of socialomics","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of socialomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0358.1000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Pakistan and Turkey enjoy great similarities in many aspects. Yet, the greatest similarity among them is the history of military interventions in domestic politics. The elected governments have been overthrown by the militaries in both the countries, imposing martial laws intermittently. However, since its gaining power in 2002, the government of Justice and Development Party (AKP) has taken series of steps to re-balance Turkish civil-military relations in favour of elected government, which have proved successful in thwarting coup attempts by the country’s military. Pakistan being a parliamentary democracy has no place for its military to indulge in domestic politics. However, Pakistan has remained under direct military rule for half of the country’s existence. For the remaining half, a fragile democracy existed with ominous threat of military rule. In this article, an attempt has been made to identify the causes of military’s intervention in domestic politics in Pakistan. Some parallels have been drawn to the transforming civil-military relations in Turkey, with a view to draw some pertinent lessons for Pakistan. This article suggests certain first and second-generation measures for democratic government in Pakistan for ensuring civilian supremacy in civil-military relations as enunciated by its constitution.
重新思考巴基斯坦的军民关系:土耳其的一些教训
巴基斯坦和土耳其在许多方面有很大的相似之处。然而,他们之间最大的相似之处是军事干预国内政治的历史。这两个国家的民选政府都被军队推翻,断断续续地实施戒严令。然而,自2002年掌权以来,正义与发展党(AKP)政府采取了一系列措施来重新平衡土耳其文武关系,以支持民选政府,事实证明,这些措施成功地挫败了该国军方的政变企图。巴基斯坦是一个议会民主制国家,没有地方让军方沉迷于国内政治。然而,巴基斯坦在建国的一半时间里一直处于军事直接统治之下。对于剩下的一半人来说,脆弱的民主存在于军事统治的不祥威胁中。本文试图找出巴基斯坦军方干预国内政治的原因。土耳其正在转变的军民关系也有一些相似之处,以期为巴基斯坦吸取一些相关的教训。本文提出了巴基斯坦民主政府的某些第一代和第二代措施,以确保其宪法所阐明的文官至上的军民关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信