The Effects of the Intestate Succession Law 1985 (PNDCL 111) and the Head of Family Accountability Law 1985 (PNDCL 114) on Youth Access to Agricultural Land in the Techiman Traditional Area of Ghana

J. Kidido, J. Bugri, R. K. Kasanga
{"title":"The Effects of the Intestate Succession Law 1985 (PNDCL 111) and the Head of Family Accountability Law 1985 (PNDCL 114) on Youth Access to Agricultural Land in the Techiman Traditional Area of Ghana","authors":"J. Kidido, J. Bugri, R. K. Kasanga","doi":"10.4314/GJDS.V15I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the effects of the Intestate Succession Law 1985 (PNDCL 111) and the Head of Family Accountability Law 1985 (PNDCL 114) on youth access to agricultural land in the context of customary land tenure. Using the Techiman Traditional Area in Ghana as a case study, the study sampled 455 youth and 23 elders using multiple sampling techniques. It was revealed that while PNDCL 111 has had some positive effects on the ability of the youth to inherit personal properties of their deceased parents; its exemption of family land in terms of application takes agricultural land access through inheritance outside the purview of the law. Given that majority of agricultural lands are family property, youth land access option through inheritance under the law is thus limited. Again, there are no more vacant lands to be acquired as personal property which the youth can inherit under the law. In the case of PNDCL 114, the study found that the law provides no practical support to the youth in asserting claims to land or seeking accountability from their elders over land proceeds. It is recommended that both PNDCL 111 and PNDCL 114 be reviewed to reflect these limitations. Also, the Head of Family Accountability law should make Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms an integral part of the law to improve on dispute adjudication given that court actions to demand accountability are not generally culturally acceptable. KEY WORDS : Legislative interventions, Youth, Land, Access, Ghana","PeriodicalId":110495,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Journal of Development Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/GJDS.V15I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of the Intestate Succession Law 1985 (PNDCL 111) and the Head of Family Accountability Law 1985 (PNDCL 114) on youth access to agricultural land in the context of customary land tenure. Using the Techiman Traditional Area in Ghana as a case study, the study sampled 455 youth and 23 elders using multiple sampling techniques. It was revealed that while PNDCL 111 has had some positive effects on the ability of the youth to inherit personal properties of their deceased parents; its exemption of family land in terms of application takes agricultural land access through inheritance outside the purview of the law. Given that majority of agricultural lands are family property, youth land access option through inheritance under the law is thus limited. Again, there are no more vacant lands to be acquired as personal property which the youth can inherit under the law. In the case of PNDCL 114, the study found that the law provides no practical support to the youth in asserting claims to land or seeking accountability from their elders over land proceeds. It is recommended that both PNDCL 111 and PNDCL 114 be reviewed to reflect these limitations. Also, the Head of Family Accountability law should make Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms an integral part of the law to improve on dispute adjudication given that court actions to demand accountability are not generally culturally acceptable. KEY WORDS : Legislative interventions, Youth, Land, Access, Ghana
1985年《无遗嘱继承法》(PNDCL 111)和1985年《家庭责任法》(PNDCL 114)对加纳Techiman传统地区青年获得农业用地的影响
本文考察了1985年《无遗嘱继承法》(PNDCL 111)和1985年《家庭责任法》(PNDCL 114)在习惯土地保有的背景下对青年获得农业用地的影响。本研究以加纳的Techiman传统地区为例,采用多种抽样技术对455名青年和23名老年人进行了抽样。据透露,虽然《国家财产保护法》111对青年继承其已故父母个人财产的能力有一些积极的影响;它在适用方面对家庭土地的豁免,使得通过继承获得农业土地超出了法律的范围。由于大部分农地是家庭财产,因此根据法律,青年通过继承获得土地的选择有限。再一次,没有更多的空地可以作为个人财产获得,年轻人可以根据法律继承。在PNDCL 114的案例中,研究发现,法律没有为青年主张对土地的所有权或要求其长辈对土地收益负责提供实际支持。建议对PNDCL 111和PNDCL 114进行审查以反映这些局限性。此外,《家庭负责人问责法》应使替代性争端解决机制成为法律的一个组成部分,以改进争端裁决,因为要求问责的法院行动在文化上通常是不可接受的。关键词:立法干预,青年,土地,获取,加纳
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信