Engaging with difference in science classrooms: Using CDA to identify interpersonal aspects of inclusive pedagogy

M. Hanrahan
{"title":"Engaging with difference in science classrooms: Using CDA to identify interpersonal aspects of inclusive pedagogy","authors":"M. Hanrahan","doi":"10.1080/17508480509556427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Critical discourse analysis (CDA) can be a powerful tool for focusing on aspects of social practice which might otherwise go unremarked but which may have a significant impact on who has access to a specific area of learning. The quality of interpersonal relationships has long been acknowledged as a crucial aspect of success in teaching, including teaching in ‘content’ area subjects such as science. However, the development of excellence in this aspect of science pedagogy is given scant attention, with disciplinary content being the main focus of most curriculum reforms designed to make science more accessible for all. This may be due in part to a paucity of research into ways of creating a positive interpersonal environment in science which in turn may be due to an ignorance of the best tools available for this purpose. My research attempts to redress this balance somewhat by providing critical analyses, using CDA, of the pedagogical discourse practices of teachers who are successful in engaging a wide range of students in school science. In this article I will focus on how difference and intertextuality have been handled in a short sample of text taken from a ‘learning support’ Year 9–10 science class.","PeriodicalId":347655,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Studies in Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480509556427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Critical discourse analysis (CDA) can be a powerful tool for focusing on aspects of social practice which might otherwise go unremarked but which may have a significant impact on who has access to a specific area of learning. The quality of interpersonal relationships has long been acknowledged as a crucial aspect of success in teaching, including teaching in ‘content’ area subjects such as science. However, the development of excellence in this aspect of science pedagogy is given scant attention, with disciplinary content being the main focus of most curriculum reforms designed to make science more accessible for all. This may be due in part to a paucity of research into ways of creating a positive interpersonal environment in science which in turn may be due to an ignorance of the best tools available for this purpose. My research attempts to redress this balance somewhat by providing critical analyses, using CDA, of the pedagogical discourse practices of teachers who are successful in engaging a wide range of students in school science. In this article I will focus on how difference and intertextuality have been handled in a short sample of text taken from a ‘learning support’ Year 9–10 science class.
参与科学课堂的差异:使用批评性话语分析来识别包容性教学法的人际关系方面
批评性话语分析(CDA)是一种强大的工具,可以关注社会实践的各个方面,否则这些方面可能会被忽视,但它可能会对谁有机会进入特定的学习领域产生重大影响。长期以来,人际关系的质量一直被认为是教学成功的一个关键方面,包括科学等“内容”领域的教学。然而,在科学教学的这一方面,优秀的发展受到了很少的关注,学科内容是大多数课程改革的主要焦点,旨在使所有人都能更容易地获得科学。这可能部分是由于缺乏对科学中创造积极人际环境的方法的研究,而这反过来又可能是由于对可用于此目的的最佳工具的无知。我的研究试图通过使用批评性话语分析(CDA)对教师的教学话语实践进行批判性分析,从而在一定程度上纠正这种平衡,这些教师成功地吸引了广泛的学生参与学校科学。在这篇文章中,我将重点讨论如何处理差异和互文性,这是一个来自9-10年级“学习支持”科学课的简短文本样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信