Breast Cancer Prediction Using Different Machine Learning Algorithms: A Comparative Study

Chitra Saini, Kapil Dev Mahato, Chandrashekhar Azad, U. Kumar
{"title":"Breast Cancer Prediction Using Different Machine Learning Algorithms: A Comparative Study","authors":"Chitra Saini, Kapil Dev Mahato, Chandrashekhar Azad, U. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/ICAIA57370.2023.10169729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the World Health organization’s (WHO) 2020 report, 2.3 million new cases of breast cancer were recorded, and 685,000 women died due to breast cancer. To treat breast cancer early, a lot of research has been proposed using different types of techniques in the past few years. In recent years, machine learning algorithms (MLAs) have become popular for detection due to their improved accuracy and performance. This paper used 13 supervised machine learning (SML) techniques, namely: Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Adaptive Boosting (AB), Categorical Boosting (CB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Extra trees (ET) to predict the outcomes of the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Original (WBCO) dataset from the UCI repository. When all thirteen algorithms were evaluated and compared, MLP outperforms them all with the highest accuracy (98.76%). This accuracy value is 0.56% greater than the recently reported accuracy value of 98.2% for the MLP classifier for the same dataset.","PeriodicalId":196526,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications (ICAIA) Alliance Technology Conference (ATCON-1)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications (ICAIA) Alliance Technology Conference (ATCON-1)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIA57370.2023.10169729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the World Health organization’s (WHO) 2020 report, 2.3 million new cases of breast cancer were recorded, and 685,000 women died due to breast cancer. To treat breast cancer early, a lot of research has been proposed using different types of techniques in the past few years. In recent years, machine learning algorithms (MLAs) have become popular for detection due to their improved accuracy and performance. This paper used 13 supervised machine learning (SML) techniques, namely: Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Adaptive Boosting (AB), Categorical Boosting (CB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Extra trees (ET) to predict the outcomes of the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Original (WBCO) dataset from the UCI repository. When all thirteen algorithms were evaluated and compared, MLP outperforms them all with the highest accuracy (98.76%). This accuracy value is 0.56% greater than the recently reported accuracy value of 98.2% for the MLP classifier for the same dataset.
使用不同机器学习算法预测乳腺癌:一项比较研究
根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)2020年的报告,记录了230万例乳腺癌新病例,68.5万名妇女死于乳腺癌。为了早期治疗乳腺癌,在过去的几年里,许多研究都提出了使用不同类型的技术。近年来,机器学习算法(MLAs)由于其提高的准确性和性能而在检测中变得流行。本文使用了13种监督机器学习(SML)技术,即:决策树(DT)、逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、k近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、梯度增强(GB)、极限梯度增强(XGB)、自适应增强(AB)、分类增强(CB)、光梯度增强机(LGBM)、多层感知器(MLP)和额外树(ET)来预测来自UCI存储库的威斯康星乳腺癌原始(WBCO)数据集的结果。当所有13种算法进行评估和比较时,MLP以最高的准确率(98.76%)优于所有算法。对于相同的数据集,该精度值比最近报道的MLP分类器的98.2%的精度值高0.56%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信