The Continued Nexus between School and Residential Segregation

P. Ong, J. Rickles
{"title":"The Continued Nexus between School and Residential Segregation","authors":"P. Ong, J. Rickles","doi":"10.15779/Z385D8ND61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the goals of the symposium, \"Rekindling the Spirit of Brown,\" is \"to develop innovative and creative strategies for insuring equal educational opportunity for students of color in K-12 grades.\" As the other articles point out, the cry to recommit to the struggle for educational equity is a response to the failure to achieve this goal over the last half century. Effective strategies must be rooted in a concrete understanding of the forces and dynamics that block progress. This article tackles one aspect of this problem: how the residential location of children reinforces school segregation. Overcoming the barriers created by this spatial pattern is, in our opinion, necessary to achieving the symposium's goals, and the first step is to understand the nature and magnitude of the problem. Two of the most visible and pernicious manifestations of a racially divided society are school and residential segregation. Both are the results of and contributing factors to racial inequality. Perhaps less understood is how school and residential segregation are inherently linked to each other. De jure residential and school segregation has long disappeared. In 1948, the Supreme Court ended the legal use of restrictive covenants to restrict the sales of homes in white neighborhoods to minorities in its Shelley v. Kraemer decision.' By 1954, the Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision also ended the practice of \"separate but equal\" schools for 2 African Americans. Moreover, civil rights laws enacted in the 1960s further prohibited racial discrimination in housing and education. Yet, despite these judicial and statutory prohibitions against discrimination, and even with considerable efforts to desegregate neighborhoods and schools, we still remain a spatially divided society. De facto segregation remains prevalent in both housing and education.","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z385D8ND61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

One of the goals of the symposium, "Rekindling the Spirit of Brown," is "to develop innovative and creative strategies for insuring equal educational opportunity for students of color in K-12 grades." As the other articles point out, the cry to recommit to the struggle for educational equity is a response to the failure to achieve this goal over the last half century. Effective strategies must be rooted in a concrete understanding of the forces and dynamics that block progress. This article tackles one aspect of this problem: how the residential location of children reinforces school segregation. Overcoming the barriers created by this spatial pattern is, in our opinion, necessary to achieving the symposium's goals, and the first step is to understand the nature and magnitude of the problem. Two of the most visible and pernicious manifestations of a racially divided society are school and residential segregation. Both are the results of and contributing factors to racial inequality. Perhaps less understood is how school and residential segregation are inherently linked to each other. De jure residential and school segregation has long disappeared. In 1948, the Supreme Court ended the legal use of restrictive covenants to restrict the sales of homes in white neighborhoods to minorities in its Shelley v. Kraemer decision.' By 1954, the Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision also ended the practice of "separate but equal" schools for 2 African Americans. Moreover, civil rights laws enacted in the 1960s further prohibited racial discrimination in housing and education. Yet, despite these judicial and statutory prohibitions against discrimination, and even with considerable efforts to desegregate neighborhoods and schools, we still remain a spatially divided society. De facto segregation remains prevalent in both housing and education.
学校隔离与居住隔离之间的持续联系
“重燃布朗精神”研讨会的目标之一是“制定创新和创造性的策略,以确保K-12年级有色人种学生的平等教育机会。”正如其他文章所指出的那样,重新致力于争取教育公平的呼声是对过去半个世纪未能实现这一目标的回应。有效的战略必须植根于对阻碍进步的力量和动力的具体理解。这篇文章解决了这个问题的一个方面:儿童的居住地点如何加强学校隔离。我们认为,克服这种空间格局造成的障碍对于实现研讨会的目标是必要的,第一步是了解问题的性质和严重程度。种族分裂社会的两个最明显和最有害的表现是学校和住宅隔离。两者都是种族不平等的结果和促成因素。也许人们不太了解的是,学校和住宅隔离是如何内在地相互联系在一起的。法律上的住宅和学校隔离早已不复存在。1948年,最高法院在谢利诉克雷默案(Shelley v. Kraemer)的判决中,终止了限制白人社区向少数族裔出售房屋的限制性契约的合法使用。到1954年,最高法院对布朗诉教育委员会案的裁决也结束了非裔美国人“隔离但平等”学校的做法。此外,1960年代颁布的民权法进一步禁止住房和教育方面的种族歧视。然而,尽管有这些禁止歧视的司法和法律规定,即使在社区和学校废除种族隔离方面作出了相当大的努力,我们仍然是一个空间分裂的社会。事实上的种族隔离在住房和教育领域仍然普遍存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信