Immunotherapy with lymphokine-activated natural killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2: a feasibility trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

T Hercend, F Farace, D Baume, F Charpentier, J P Droz, F Triebel, B Escudier
{"title":"Immunotherapy with lymphokine-activated natural killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2: a feasibility trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.","authors":"T Hercend,&nbsp;F Farace,&nbsp;D Baume,&nbsp;F Charpentier,&nbsp;J P Droz,&nbsp;F Triebel,&nbsp;B Escudier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical immunotherapy trials have been performed recently where ex vivo interleukin-2 (IL-2)-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (i.e., the \"LAK\" cells) have been transfused in addition to IL-2 infusions. In such protocols, patients have received highly heterogeneous cell suspensions and the nature of the effector cells that may have contributed to tumor regression has remained unclear. In certain animal models, it has appeared that natural killer lymphocytes were the effector cell type responsible for tumor regression. To test whether NK cells could eventually be relevant for the treatment of human tumors, we have performed a feasibility trial where purified lymphokine-activated natural killer (LANAK) cells have been prepared and transfused to a limited series of renal cell carcinoma patients receiving IL-2 (continuous infusions at 3 x 10(6) U/m2/day). Natural killer lymphocytes (1-2 x 10(6] were purified from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and expanded during 4-5 weeks in the presence of IL-2 on microtiter plates containing feeder layers cells. In vitro, the resulting LANAK cell suspensions were 100 times (range of 2 to 10(3] more efficient against Daudi target cells than their autologous LAK counterparts. Twelve patients were included; 9 received the two planned courses of treatment with LANAK cells and IL-2. Overall toxicity was relatively moderate. Besides occasional chills, there were no apparent secondary effects due to cell infusions. The mean number of LANAK cells transfused per patients was 45.1 x 10(9), ranging from 7 to 125 x 10(9). The biodistribution of LANAK cells was similar to that reported previously for LAK cells with no preferential localization to tumor sites. We conclude from this study that using well-defined populations of effector lymphocytes is a feasible cellular therapy approach that may lead to improved understanding and efficacy of the novel immunotherapy methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15063,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological response modifiers","volume":"9 6","pages":"546-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological response modifiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical immunotherapy trials have been performed recently where ex vivo interleukin-2 (IL-2)-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (i.e., the "LAK" cells) have been transfused in addition to IL-2 infusions. In such protocols, patients have received highly heterogeneous cell suspensions and the nature of the effector cells that may have contributed to tumor regression has remained unclear. In certain animal models, it has appeared that natural killer lymphocytes were the effector cell type responsible for tumor regression. To test whether NK cells could eventually be relevant for the treatment of human tumors, we have performed a feasibility trial where purified lymphokine-activated natural killer (LANAK) cells have been prepared and transfused to a limited series of renal cell carcinoma patients receiving IL-2 (continuous infusions at 3 x 10(6) U/m2/day). Natural killer lymphocytes (1-2 x 10(6] were purified from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and expanded during 4-5 weeks in the presence of IL-2 on microtiter plates containing feeder layers cells. In vitro, the resulting LANAK cell suspensions were 100 times (range of 2 to 10(3] more efficient against Daudi target cells than their autologous LAK counterparts. Twelve patients were included; 9 received the two planned courses of treatment with LANAK cells and IL-2. Overall toxicity was relatively moderate. Besides occasional chills, there were no apparent secondary effects due to cell infusions. The mean number of LANAK cells transfused per patients was 45.1 x 10(9), ranging from 7 to 125 x 10(9). The biodistribution of LANAK cells was similar to that reported previously for LAK cells with no preferential localization to tumor sites. We conclude from this study that using well-defined populations of effector lymphocytes is a feasible cellular therapy approach that may lead to improved understanding and efficacy of the novel immunotherapy methods.

淋巴因子活化的自然杀伤细胞和重组白细胞介素-2的免疫治疗:转移性肾细胞癌的可行性试验。
最近进行了临床免疫治疗试验,除输注IL-2外,还输注体外白细胞介素-2 (IL-2)活化的外周血单个核细胞(即LAK细胞)。在这些方案中,患者接受了高度异质的细胞悬液,而可能导致肿瘤消退的效应细胞的性质仍不清楚。在某些动物模型中,自然杀伤淋巴细胞似乎是负责肿瘤消退的效应细胞类型。为了测试NK细胞是否最终与人类肿瘤的治疗相关,我们进行了一项可行性试验,制备纯化的淋巴因子激活的自然杀伤细胞(LANAK),并将其输注到接受IL-2治疗的有限系列肾癌患者中(以3 × 10(6) U/m2/天的速度连续输注)。自然杀伤淋巴细胞(1-2 × 10(6))从外周血单个核细胞中纯化出来,在含有饲养层细胞的微滴板上,在IL-2存在下扩增4-5周。在体外,所得到的LANAK细胞悬液对Daudi靶细胞的效率是其自体LAK对应物的100倍(范围为2至10倍)。纳入12例患者;9例接受两个疗程的LANAK细胞和IL-2治疗。总体毒性相对中等。除了偶尔的寒战外,细胞输注没有明显的继发性影响。每例患者平均输注LANAK细胞数为45.1 × 10(9),范围为7 ~ 125 × 10(9)。LANAK细胞的生物分布与之前报道的LAK细胞相似,没有优先定位到肿瘤部位。我们从这项研究中得出结论,使用定义明确的效应淋巴细胞群是一种可行的细胞治疗方法,可能会提高人们对新型免疫治疗方法的理解和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信