Intra-arterial thrombectomy in elderly patients: assessment of arterial tortuosity in determining successful procedure

S. Kye, Junhyoung Ahn, I. Chang, Joon-Ho Song, Ji Hee Kim, Heui Seung Lee, J. Oh
{"title":"Intra-arterial thrombectomy in elderly patients: assessment of arterial tortuosity in determining successful procedure","authors":"S. Kye, Junhyoung Ahn, I. Chang, Joon-Ho Song, Ji Hee Kim, Heui Seung Lee, J. Oh","doi":"10.51638/jksgn.2021.00108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) has become the mainstay of treatment for ischemic stroke caused by large artery occlusion [1,2]. However, IAT in older patients should be carefully considered due to uncertain clinical outcomes despite the risk of procedure-related complications [3,4]. Vascular tortuosity and longer procedure time have been suggested as factors associated with Objective: Intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) is the mainstay of initial treatment for intracranial large-vessel occlusion. However, arterial tortuosity is associated with procedural failure and unfavorable outcomes in older patients. Methods: We reviewed patients with ischemic stroke (>75 years) treated with IAT and analyzed procedure-related complications and arterial tortuosity based on pre-procedural computed tomography angiography. Results: Of the 29 patients, 7 had distal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion, 18 had middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, 3 had anterior cerebral artery and MCA occlusion, and one had distal ICA and MCA occlusion. Significant arterial tortuosity was observed in 9 patients (31.0%). The degree of recanalization, as assessed by the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade, did not differ according to significant arterial tortuosity (P=0.55). Post-procedural subarachnoid hemorrhage was observed in 17 of 29 patients (58.6%) and there was no significant association with significant arterial tortuosity. The puncture to recanalization time was not significantly different according to the presence of significant arterial tortuosity (51.6±22 minutes vs. 53±43.9 minutes; P=0.93). Additionally, the number of thrombus retrieval trials during the procedure did not show a significant relationship with arterial tortuosity (2.4±1.2 times vs. 2.6±2.5 times; P=0.86). Conclusion: IAT can be performed in patients aged >75 years. Arterial tortuosity was not significantly associated with successful recanalization or post-procedural complications. Therefore, whether to perform IAT in older patients should not be determined only by arterial tortuosity.","PeriodicalId":161607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51638/jksgn.2021.00108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) has become the mainstay of treatment for ischemic stroke caused by large artery occlusion [1,2]. However, IAT in older patients should be carefully considered due to uncertain clinical outcomes despite the risk of procedure-related complications [3,4]. Vascular tortuosity and longer procedure time have been suggested as factors associated with Objective: Intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) is the mainstay of initial treatment for intracranial large-vessel occlusion. However, arterial tortuosity is associated with procedural failure and unfavorable outcomes in older patients. Methods: We reviewed patients with ischemic stroke (>75 years) treated with IAT and analyzed procedure-related complications and arterial tortuosity based on pre-procedural computed tomography angiography. Results: Of the 29 patients, 7 had distal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion, 18 had middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, 3 had anterior cerebral artery and MCA occlusion, and one had distal ICA and MCA occlusion. Significant arterial tortuosity was observed in 9 patients (31.0%). The degree of recanalization, as assessed by the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade, did not differ according to significant arterial tortuosity (P=0.55). Post-procedural subarachnoid hemorrhage was observed in 17 of 29 patients (58.6%) and there was no significant association with significant arterial tortuosity. The puncture to recanalization time was not significantly different according to the presence of significant arterial tortuosity (51.6±22 minutes vs. 53±43.9 minutes; P=0.93). Additionally, the number of thrombus retrieval trials during the procedure did not show a significant relationship with arterial tortuosity (2.4±1.2 times vs. 2.6±2.5 times; P=0.86). Conclusion: IAT can be performed in patients aged >75 years. Arterial tortuosity was not significantly associated with successful recanalization or post-procedural complications. Therefore, whether to perform IAT in older patients should not be determined only by arterial tortuosity.
老年患者动脉内血栓切除术:评估动脉弯曲程度以确定手术成功
动脉内取栓(IAT)已成为治疗大动脉闭塞所致缺血性脑卒中的主流方法[1,2]。然而,尽管存在手术相关并发症的风险,但由于临床结果不确定,老年患者应谨慎考虑IAT[3,4]。目的:动脉内血栓切除术(IAT)是颅内大血管闭塞初始治疗的主要方法。然而,在老年患者中,动脉扭曲与手术失败和不良结果有关。方法:我们回顾了接受IAT治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者(>75岁),并分析了手术相关并发症和基于术前计算机断层血管造影的动脉扭曲。结果:29例患者中,颈动脉远端闭塞7例,大脑中动脉闭塞18例,大脑前动脉和MCA闭塞3例,颈动脉远端和MCA闭塞1例。9例(31.0%)出现明显的动脉扭曲。再通程度,通过改良的脑梗死级别的溶栓来评估,根据明显的动脉扭曲没有差异(P=0.55)。术后蛛网膜下腔出血在29例患者中有17例(58.6%),与明显的动脉扭曲无显著相关性。存在明显动脉扭曲时,穿刺至再通时间差异无统计学意义(51.6±22分钟vs 53±43.9分钟);P = 0.93)。此外,手术过程中血栓回收试验的次数与动脉扭曲没有显着关系(2.4±1.2次vs 2.6±2.5次;P = 0.86)。结论:IAT可用于年龄>75岁的患者。动脉弯曲与成功再通或术后并发症无显著相关性。因此,老年患者是否行IAT手术不应仅根据动脉扭曲程度来判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信