Ability and its use in schools

A. Bradbury
{"title":"Ability and its use in schools","authors":"A. Bradbury","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1qgnq00.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter attempts to answer two questions ‘Why examine ability?’, and ‘How is ‘ability’ used in schools?’. It provides a more detailed explanation of the logic of focusing on one key concept and considering its operation at a particular historical time. This then leads onto an overview of the historical context for concepts of ‘merit’ and ‘ability’. Drawing on research data drawn from a survey of over 1000 teachers, the chapter also discusses what is particular about the current use of ability. It is argued that the very ambiguity of the term adds to its power as an organising concept which disadvantages some groups of students. Two key conceptions of ability emerge – ability as innate, and ability as positional. Finally, the last section focuses on research data on how the terms are used in schools as justification for pedagogical practices such as ability grouping. Here I set out the findings from my own research on primary education to emphasise the importance of ability in the organisation of students in classrooms. It is argued that ability works powerfully to justify systems of grouping and labelling pupils which limit expectation and attainment, often in inequitable ways.","PeriodicalId":254008,"journal":{"name":"Ability, Inequality and Post-Pandemic Schools","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ability, Inequality and Post-Pandemic Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qgnq00.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter attempts to answer two questions ‘Why examine ability?’, and ‘How is ‘ability’ used in schools?’. It provides a more detailed explanation of the logic of focusing on one key concept and considering its operation at a particular historical time. This then leads onto an overview of the historical context for concepts of ‘merit’ and ‘ability’. Drawing on research data drawn from a survey of over 1000 teachers, the chapter also discusses what is particular about the current use of ability. It is argued that the very ambiguity of the term adds to its power as an organising concept which disadvantages some groups of students. Two key conceptions of ability emerge – ability as innate, and ability as positional. Finally, the last section focuses on research data on how the terms are used in schools as justification for pedagogical practices such as ability grouping. Here I set out the findings from my own research on primary education to emphasise the importance of ability in the organisation of students in classrooms. It is argued that ability works powerfully to justify systems of grouping and labelling pupils which limit expectation and attainment, often in inequitable ways.
能力及其在学校中的运用
本章试图回答两个问题:“为什么要考察能力?”,以及“能力在学校里是如何使用的?”它对关注一个关键概念并考虑其在特定历史时期的运作的逻辑提供了更详细的解释。这就引出了对“优点”和“能力”概念的历史背景的概述。根据对1000多名教师的调查得出的研究数据,本章还讨论了当前能力使用的特别之处。有人认为,这个词的模糊性增加了它作为一个组织概念的力量,使一些学生群体处于不利地位。关于能力的两个关键概念出现了——天生的能力和定位的能力。最后,最后一部分侧重于研究数据,这些数据是如何在学校中使用这些术语作为能力分组等教学实践的理由。在这里,我列出了我自己对小学教育的研究结果,以强调能力在课堂组织学生中的重要性。有人认为,能力能有力地证明对学生进行分组和分类的制度是合理的,这些制度往往以不公平的方式限制了学生的期望和成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信