Stage-Specific Effects of Organizational Structure and Boundary-Spanning on the Performance of New Product Development Teams

Joachim Bueschken
{"title":"Stage-Specific Effects of Organizational Structure and Boundary-Spanning on the Performance of New Product Development Teams","authors":"Joachim Bueschken","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1394229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we analyze the influence of organizational design and boundary-spanning activities on the performance of new product development teams, differentiated by the stage of the innovation process. The organizational antecedents considered are organic vs. mechanistic tructures of such teams. It is proposed that due to differing information needs and different levels of uncertainty, organic structures are more suited in the early initiation stage, while mechanistic structures are more appropriate in the following implementation stage. Boundary spanning is proposed to influence performance positively in both the early and the late stage. We test our hypotheses using a sample of 133 new product development (NPD) projects. The analysis yields that not all organic structures are beneficial (detrimental) to the early (late) stage. Similarly, not all mechanistic structures are beneficial (detrimental) to the late (early) stage. This suggests that a more differentiated approach to the organizational design of NPD teams is needed. As proposed, boundary-spanning activities are positively associated with team performance in both project stages. Managerial implications and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"39 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1394229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the influence of organizational design and boundary-spanning activities on the performance of new product development teams, differentiated by the stage of the innovation process. The organizational antecedents considered are organic vs. mechanistic tructures of such teams. It is proposed that due to differing information needs and different levels of uncertainty, organic structures are more suited in the early initiation stage, while mechanistic structures are more appropriate in the following implementation stage. Boundary spanning is proposed to influence performance positively in both the early and the late stage. We test our hypotheses using a sample of 133 new product development (NPD) projects. The analysis yields that not all organic structures are beneficial (detrimental) to the early (late) stage. Similarly, not all mechanistic structures are beneficial (detrimental) to the late (early) stage. This suggests that a more differentiated approach to the organizational design of NPD teams is needed. As proposed, boundary-spanning activities are positively associated with team performance in both project stages. Managerial implications and directions for future research are discussed.
组织结构和边界跨越对新产品开发团队绩效的阶段性影响
本文分析了组织设计和跨界活动对新产品开发团队绩效的影响,并根据创新过程的不同阶段进行了区分。所考虑的组织前因是这种团队的有机结构与机械结构。由于信息需求的不同和不确定性程度的不同,有机结构更适合于早期启动阶段,而机械结构更适合于随后的实施阶段。边界跨越在前期和后期都会对绩效产生积极影响。我们使用133个新产品开发(NPD)项目的样本来检验我们的假设。分析表明,并非所有的有机结构都对早期(晚期)阶段有益(有害)。同样,并非所有的机械结构都对后期(早期)阶段有益(有害)。这表明需要对新产品开发团队的组织设计采取更加差异化的方法。如上所述,跨界活动与两个项目阶段的团队绩效呈正相关。讨论了未来研究的管理意义和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信