How We Talk when We Talk About Disabled Children and Their Families: An Invitation to Queer the Discourse

Maren Metell
{"title":"How We Talk when We Talk About Disabled Children and Their Families: An Invitation to Queer the Discourse","authors":"Maren Metell","doi":"10.15845/VOICES.V19I3.2680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite contemporary perspectives in resource-oriented music therapy, community music therapy, and anti-oppressive practice, there seems still to be a tendency to describe disabled children and their families in a pathologizing, problem-focused way. Disability is often located within the child and not in the societal structures that sustain and support the concept of disability as tragedy and burden for the families. Queer theories challenge the concepts of normality and fixed identities, reject pathologization, and politicize access. In this paper, I attempt to explore how queertheories offer a critical perspective on normativity, identity, and power. I will do this by exploring the concept of normality and normativity and discourse current representations of disabled children in the music therapy literature and by reflecting upon an ongoing participatory action research project where I aim to co-create knowledge on musicking, its accessibility, and meaning together with disabled children and their families. I argue that we need to change the way we talk and write about our practice as well as to challenge the concepts and attitudes toward diversity in order to contribute to inclusive environments that appreciate and celebrate diversity.","PeriodicalId":340679,"journal":{"name":"Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15845/VOICES.V19I3.2680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Despite contemporary perspectives in resource-oriented music therapy, community music therapy, and anti-oppressive practice, there seems still to be a tendency to describe disabled children and their families in a pathologizing, problem-focused way. Disability is often located within the child and not in the societal structures that sustain and support the concept of disability as tragedy and burden for the families. Queer theories challenge the concepts of normality and fixed identities, reject pathologization, and politicize access. In this paper, I attempt to explore how queertheories offer a critical perspective on normativity, identity, and power. I will do this by exploring the concept of normality and normativity and discourse current representations of disabled children in the music therapy literature and by reflecting upon an ongoing participatory action research project where I aim to co-create knowledge on musicking, its accessibility, and meaning together with disabled children and their families. I argue that we need to change the way we talk and write about our practice as well as to challenge the concepts and attitudes toward diversity in order to contribute to inclusive environments that appreciate and celebrate diversity.
当我们谈论残疾儿童和他们的家庭时,我们如何说话:一种话语的邀请
尽管在以资源为导向的音乐治疗、社区音乐治疗和反压迫实践方面有当代的观点,但似乎仍然有一种倾向,即以病态、问题为中心的方式来描述残疾儿童及其家庭。残疾往往存在于儿童身上,而不是存在于维持和支持残疾是悲剧和家庭负担概念的社会结构中。酷儿理论挑战常态和固定身份的概念,拒绝病态化,并将访问政治化。在本文中,我试图探讨酷儿理论如何提供规范性、身份和权力的批判性视角。为此,我将探索音乐治疗文献中正常和规范的概念,并讨论残疾儿童的当前表现形式,并通过反思一个正在进行的参与性行动研究项目,我的目标是与残疾儿童及其家庭共同创造有关音乐、其可及性和意义的知识。我认为,我们需要改变我们谈论和撰写实践的方式,并挑战对多样性的概念和态度,以便为欣赏和庆祝多样性的包容性环境做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信