Friedman Test for Analysing WMNs: A Comparison Study for Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing

Donald Elmazi, Tetsuya Oda, Shinji Sakamoto, Evjola Spaho, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa
{"title":"Friedman Test for Analysing WMNs: A Comparison Study for Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing","authors":"Donald Elmazi, Tetsuya Oda, Shinji Sakamoto, Evjola Spaho, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa","doi":"10.1109/IMIS.2015.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Simulated Annealing (SA). We found out that GA and SA have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-GA and WMN-SA to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution the WMN-SA performs better than WMN-GA. For Normal distribution, for big radius of communication distance, the WMN-GA has the best performance. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-SA performs better than WMN-GA for all communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-SA has better performance than WMN-GA.","PeriodicalId":144834,"journal":{"name":"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2015.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Simulated Annealing (SA). We found out that GA and SA have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-GA and WMN-SA to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution the WMN-SA performs better than WMN-GA. For Normal distribution, for big radius of communication distance, the WMN-GA has the best performance. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-SA performs better than WMN-GA for all communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-SA has better performance than WMN-GA.
分析WMNs的Friedman检验:遗传算法与模拟退火的比较研究
本文主要研究无线网状网络(WMNs)中的连通性和覆盖问题。我们使用Friedman检验来检验是否可以比较遗传算法(GA)和模拟退火算法(SA)。我们发现GA和SA在性能上存在差异。然后,我们使用实现的系统WMN-GA和WMN-SA在巨型组件大小(SGC)和覆盖网格客户端数量(NCMC)方面评估和比较了系统在不同网格客户端分布下的性能。仿真结果表明,在均匀分布情况下,WMN-SA算法优于WMN-GA算法。对于正态分布,当通信距离半径较大时,WMN-GA具有最好的性能。对于指数分布,WMN-SA在所有通信距离上都优于WMN-GA。对于威布尔分布,WMN-SA比WMN-GA具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信