Independent Component Analysis (ICA) methods for neonatal EEG artifact extraction: Sensitivity to variation of artifact properties

N. Miljković, V. Matic, S. Van Huffel, M. Popovic
{"title":"Independent Component Analysis (ICA) methods for neonatal EEG artifact extraction: Sensitivity to variation of artifact properties","authors":"N. Miljković, V. Matic, S. Van Huffel, M. Popovic","doi":"10.1109/NEUREL.2010.5644041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is becoming an accepted technique for artifact removal. Nevertheless, there is no consensus about appropriate methods for different applications. This study presents a comparison of common ICA methods: RobustICA, SOBI, JADE, and BSS-CCA, for extraction of ECG artifacts from EEG signal. Algorithms were applied to the data created by superimposing artifact free real-life neonatal EEG and synthetic ECG. Their sensitivity to variation of noise property was compared: we examined variability of Spearman correlation coefficients (SCC) for various Heart Rates (HR) in each of ICA methods. Results show that SOBI and BSS-CCA methods were less sensitive than RobustICA and JADE to artifact alterations (mean SCCs were 0.85 and 0.85 compared to 0.80 and 0.73, respectively) being quite successful in source signal extraction.","PeriodicalId":227890,"journal":{"name":"10th Symposium on Neural Network Applications in Electrical Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th Symposium on Neural Network Applications in Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEUREL.2010.5644041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is becoming an accepted technique for artifact removal. Nevertheless, there is no consensus about appropriate methods for different applications. This study presents a comparison of common ICA methods: RobustICA, SOBI, JADE, and BSS-CCA, for extraction of ECG artifacts from EEG signal. Algorithms were applied to the data created by superimposing artifact free real-life neonatal EEG and synthetic ECG. Their sensitivity to variation of noise property was compared: we examined variability of Spearman correlation coefficients (SCC) for various Heart Rates (HR) in each of ICA methods. Results show that SOBI and BSS-CCA methods were less sensitive than RobustICA and JADE to artifact alterations (mean SCCs were 0.85 and 0.85 compared to 0.80 and 0.73, respectively) being quite successful in source signal extraction.
新生儿脑电图伪影提取的独立分量分析方法:对伪影特性变化的敏感性
独立成分分析(ICA)正在成为一种被接受的人工制品去除技术。然而,对于不同应用的合适方法尚无共识。本研究比较了常用的独立分量分析方法:RobustICA、SOBI、JADE和BSS-CCA,用于从脑电信号中提取心电伪影。将无伪影的真实新生儿脑电图与人工心电图叠加生成的数据应用算法。比较了它们对噪声特性变化的敏感性:我们检查了每种ICA方法中不同心率(HR)的Spearman相关系数(SCC)的可变性。结果表明,SOBI和BSS-CCA方法对伪迹变化的敏感性低于RobustICA和JADE方法(平均scc分别为0.85和0.85,而平均scc分别为0.80和0.73),在源信号提取方面非常成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信