Development of a simple method for determination of gas permeability resistance of whole chemical protective gloves

Takamasa Aoki, S. Iwasawa, Shinobu Yamamoto, A. Takeuchi, S. Tanaka, H. Miyauchi
{"title":"Development of a simple method for determination of gas permeability resistance of whole chemical protective gloves","authors":"Takamasa Aoki, S. Iwasawa, Shinobu Yamamoto, A. Takeuchi, S. Tanaka, H. Miyauchi","doi":"10.1539/eohp.2020-0027-oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We investigated the protection performance of whole gloves by developing a straightforward permeability resistance method and evaluating the permeation over 480 min. Methods: The permeation time for toluene was obtained for seven glove types according to the Japanese Industrial Standards. In addition, the permeability resistance of whole gloves was evaluated from the ratio of collected amount of toluene in the passive layered sampler attached to the inside and outside of the glove. Results: The permeation times of the two types of polyurethane gloves evaluated were less than 1 min each. However, the percentages of toluene that permeated through the whole gloves determined by the developed method were 32.5% and 6.8% for the thin and thick gloves, respectively, at 480 min and 71.8% and 24.1% for the thin and thick gloves, respectively, at 1,440 min. Permeation times for all three types of layered films were more than 1,440 min, but the whole glove tests showed differences of 1.7%, 3.1%, and less than 0.1% at 1,440 min. The causes of these differences were assumed to be related to variations in thickness, type of material, and differences in deposition state of the various gloves. Conclusions: It became possible to grasp the permeation performance throughout whole chemical resistant gloves, which could not be known only with material testing, using a straightforward permeability test method.","PeriodicalId":278195,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2020-0027-oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated the protection performance of whole gloves by developing a straightforward permeability resistance method and evaluating the permeation over 480 min. Methods: The permeation time for toluene was obtained for seven glove types according to the Japanese Industrial Standards. In addition, the permeability resistance of whole gloves was evaluated from the ratio of collected amount of toluene in the passive layered sampler attached to the inside and outside of the glove. Results: The permeation times of the two types of polyurethane gloves evaluated were less than 1 min each. However, the percentages of toluene that permeated through the whole gloves determined by the developed method were 32.5% and 6.8% for the thin and thick gloves, respectively, at 480 min and 71.8% and 24.1% for the thin and thick gloves, respectively, at 1,440 min. Permeation times for all three types of layered films were more than 1,440 min, but the whole glove tests showed differences of 1.7%, 3.1%, and less than 0.1% at 1,440 min. The causes of these differences were assumed to be related to variations in thickness, type of material, and differences in deposition state of the various gloves. Conclusions: It became possible to grasp the permeation performance throughout whole chemical resistant gloves, which could not be known only with material testing, using a straightforward permeability test method.
建立了一种测定整个化学防护手套透气性的简易方法
目的:建立一种直接的渗透性电阻法,评价其在480 min内的渗透性,考察全手套的防护性能。方法:根据日本工业标准,计算7种手套对甲苯的渗透时间。此外,通过附着在手套内外的被动式分层取样器收集的甲苯量的比值来评价整只手套的抗渗透性能。结果:两种聚氨酯手套的渗透时间均小于1 min。然而,该方法测定的薄手套和厚手套在480 min时的渗透率分别为32.5%和6.8%,薄手套和厚手套在1440 min时的渗透率分别为71.8%和24.1%。三种层状膜的渗透时间均大于1440 min,但全手套测试的差异分别为1.7%、3.1%、在1440分钟时小于0.1%。这些差异的原因被认为与各种手套的厚度、材料类型和沉积状态的差异有关。结论:采用直接的透气性测试方法,可以全面掌握耐化学手套的透气性,这是仅通过材料测试无法了解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信