Fuzzy logic-based charging strategy for Electric Vehicles plugged into a smart grid

A. Eajal, M. Shaaban, E. El-Saadany, K. Ponnambalam
{"title":"Fuzzy logic-based charging strategy for Electric Vehicles plugged into a smart grid","authors":"A. Eajal, M. Shaaban, E. El-Saadany, K. Ponnambalam","doi":"10.1109/SEGE.2015.7324606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The smart grid allows its consumers to participate in producing cost effective, sustainable, and environmentally friendly electricity. The consumers in a smart grid, for example, can plug their Electric Vehicles (EVs) into the grid to charge and discharge their vehicles' batteries. However, charging of the electric vehicles, especially during the peak periods, can adversely impact the grid performance. Thus, in this paper, the coordinated charging of the electric vehicles problem is tackled. A fuzzy logic-based approach is developed to coordinate the electric vehicle charging such that the system minimum voltage is within the allowable limits. The inputs to the Fuzzy Charging Controller (FCC) include the States of Charge (SOC) of the electric vehicles, the grid parameters represented in the system minimum voltage, and the hourly energy price. The output of the FCC is the charging levels of the electric vehicles' batteries. The developed fuzzy logic-based charging strategy was validated on the 69-bus test system. The Fuzzy Charging (FC) was compared with three modes of uncoordinated charging, namely Slow Charging (SC), Medium Charging (MC), and Fast Charging (FC). The results of the comparative study prove the superiority of the developed fuzzy charging approach over uncoordinated charging schemes.","PeriodicalId":409488,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEGE.2015.7324606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The smart grid allows its consumers to participate in producing cost effective, sustainable, and environmentally friendly electricity. The consumers in a smart grid, for example, can plug their Electric Vehicles (EVs) into the grid to charge and discharge their vehicles' batteries. However, charging of the electric vehicles, especially during the peak periods, can adversely impact the grid performance. Thus, in this paper, the coordinated charging of the electric vehicles problem is tackled. A fuzzy logic-based approach is developed to coordinate the electric vehicle charging such that the system minimum voltage is within the allowable limits. The inputs to the Fuzzy Charging Controller (FCC) include the States of Charge (SOC) of the electric vehicles, the grid parameters represented in the system minimum voltage, and the hourly energy price. The output of the FCC is the charging levels of the electric vehicles' batteries. The developed fuzzy logic-based charging strategy was validated on the 69-bus test system. The Fuzzy Charging (FC) was compared with three modes of uncoordinated charging, namely Slow Charging (SC), Medium Charging (MC), and Fast Charging (FC). The results of the comparative study prove the superiority of the developed fuzzy charging approach over uncoordinated charging schemes.
基于模糊逻辑的电动汽车接入智能电网充电策略
智能电网允许其消费者参与生产具有成本效益、可持续和环保的电力。例如,智能电网中的消费者可以将他们的电动汽车(ev)插入电网,为汽车电池充电和放电。然而,电动汽车的充电,特别是在高峰时段,会对电网性能产生不利影响。因此,本文对电动汽车的协调充电问题进行了研究。提出了一种基于模糊逻辑的电动汽车充电协调方法,使系统最小电压在允许范围内。模糊充电控制器(FCC)的输入包括电动汽车的荷电状态(SOC)、以系统最小电压表示的电网参数和每小时能源价格。FCC的输出是电动汽车电池的充电水平。所提出的基于模糊逻辑的充电策略在69辆客车的测试系统上得到了验证。将模糊充电(FC)与慢速充电(SC)、中速充电(MC)和快速充电(FC)三种不协调充电模式进行了比较。对比研究结果表明,所提出的模糊收费方法优于不协调收费方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信