Adoption Ouroboros

Malinda L. Seymore
{"title":"Adoption Ouroboros","authors":"Malinda L. Seymore","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3944784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ouroboros – the circular symbol of the snake eating its tail; an endless cycle. As the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan in chaos, the attention of Americans turned to the plight of children in need of rescue. For many Americans, rescue means adoption. The history of international adoption began with rescues following America’s wars in Europe and Asia. International adoption is an ouroboros, repeating the pattern of adoption as a response to humanitarian crises. But as human and charitable as the impulse to adopt children in crisis may be, it is often not in the best interests of children. They are separated from family, and perhaps never reunited. Their identities may be lost in the scramble to get them to safety. They may be trafficked rather than adopted through reputable means. And in the midst of a highly disruptive crisis, their lives are further disrupted by being removed from their usual support networks – family and community. The often destructive effects of international adoption in the midst of crises is furthered by the general lax regulation of international adoption. The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, as interpreted in the U.S., does not offer sufficient protection, and the U.S. fails to utilize all its available resources to prevent children being trafficked into international adoption by refusing to categorize illegal adoption as human trafficking. As the temptation to rescue children increases, the U.S. needs to do more to prevent the ouroboros of international adoption as a response to humanitarian crises.","PeriodicalId":110365,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Children's Rights (Topic)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Children's Rights (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3944784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ouroboros – the circular symbol of the snake eating its tail; an endless cycle. As the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan in chaos, the attention of Americans turned to the plight of children in need of rescue. For many Americans, rescue means adoption. The history of international adoption began with rescues following America’s wars in Europe and Asia. International adoption is an ouroboros, repeating the pattern of adoption as a response to humanitarian crises. But as human and charitable as the impulse to adopt children in crisis may be, it is often not in the best interests of children. They are separated from family, and perhaps never reunited. Their identities may be lost in the scramble to get them to safety. They may be trafficked rather than adopted through reputable means. And in the midst of a highly disruptive crisis, their lives are further disrupted by being removed from their usual support networks – family and community. The often destructive effects of international adoption in the midst of crises is furthered by the general lax regulation of international adoption. The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, as interpreted in the U.S., does not offer sufficient protection, and the U.S. fails to utilize all its available resources to prevent children being trafficked into international adoption by refusing to categorize illegal adoption as human trafficking. As the temptation to rescue children increases, the U.S. needs to do more to prevent the ouroboros of international adoption as a response to humanitarian crises.
采用大毒蛇
衔尾蛇——圆形的象征蛇在吃自己的尾巴;一个无尽的循环。随着美国从混乱的阿富汗撤军,美国人的注意力转向了需要救援的儿童的困境。对许多美国人来说,救助意味着收养。国际收养的历史始于美国在欧洲和亚洲战争后的救助。国际收养是一条毒蛇,重复着作为人道主义危机反应的收养模式。但是,尽管在危机中收养孩子的冲动可能是人道和慈善的,但这往往不符合孩子的最大利益。他们与家人分离,也许永远不会团聚。他们的身份可能会在把他们送到安全地带的匆忙中丢失。他们可能被贩卖,而不是通过信誉良好的途径被收养。在一场极具破坏性的危机中,他们的生活因离开了通常的支持网络——家庭和社区而进一步受到破坏。在危机期间,国际收养往往具有破坏性的影响,由于对国际收养的管制普遍松懈而进一步加剧。根据美国的解释,《海牙跨国收养公约》没有提供足够的保护,美国拒绝将非法收养归类为人口贩运,未能充分利用其所有可用资源来防止儿童被贩卖到国际收养。随着救助儿童的诱惑增加,美国需要做更多的工作来防止国际收养作为对人道主义危机的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书