Modern methods of foot-and-mouth disease diagnosis (review)

Z. Drozhzhe, Ia.N. Dzuba, G. Kyivska
{"title":"Modern methods of foot-and-mouth disease diagnosis (review)","authors":"Z. Drozhzhe, Ia.N. Dzuba, G. Kyivska","doi":"10.31073/VET_BIOTECH38-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"development, improvement and application of modern methods for the diagnosis of FMD (PCR, ELISA). Results of research and discussion. Generally, a suspected case of FMD can be identified based on observations of clinical signs. However, diagnoses based on clinical symptoms are highly unreliable, because several other diseases share similar symptoms as FMD, which include swine vesicular disease (SVD), vesicular stomatitis and vesicular exanthema. Swine are vulnerable to vesicular stomatitis, SVD, and FMD, whereas cattle are vulnerable to vesicular stomatitis and FMD, all of which could not be distinguished based on clinical symptoms. Conventional techniques such as complement fixation test (CFT), virus isolation test, virus neutralization test (VNT), and ELISA are routinely used to detect FMDV in clinical samples. Advancement in molecular techniques accelerates rapid and accurate diagnoses of FMDV through detection of the viral RNA. In this article, the most recent advancements in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and RT-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)-based methods are thoroughly reviewed. Lastly, the roles of lateral flow immunochromatographic (LFI) test strips in FMDV diagnosis are also discussed. Conclusions and prospects for further research. Various diagnostic methods ranging from conventional such as virus isolation and competitive- and blocking-antigen ELISA to molecular-based methods such as RT-PCR and RT-LAMP have been developed over the years. Although ELISA-based methods have good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, molecular detection methods have the advantage of higher analytical sensitivity for the detection of minimal viral RNA.","PeriodicalId":274594,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin \"Veterinary biotechnology\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin \"Veterinary biotechnology\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31073/VET_BIOTECH38-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

development, improvement and application of modern methods for the diagnosis of FMD (PCR, ELISA). Results of research and discussion. Generally, a suspected case of FMD can be identified based on observations of clinical signs. However, diagnoses based on clinical symptoms are highly unreliable, because several other diseases share similar symptoms as FMD, which include swine vesicular disease (SVD), vesicular stomatitis and vesicular exanthema. Swine are vulnerable to vesicular stomatitis, SVD, and FMD, whereas cattle are vulnerable to vesicular stomatitis and FMD, all of which could not be distinguished based on clinical symptoms. Conventional techniques such as complement fixation test (CFT), virus isolation test, virus neutralization test (VNT), and ELISA are routinely used to detect FMDV in clinical samples. Advancement in molecular techniques accelerates rapid and accurate diagnoses of FMDV through detection of the viral RNA. In this article, the most recent advancements in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and RT-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)-based methods are thoroughly reviewed. Lastly, the roles of lateral flow immunochromatographic (LFI) test strips in FMDV diagnosis are also discussed. Conclusions and prospects for further research. Various diagnostic methods ranging from conventional such as virus isolation and competitive- and blocking-antigen ELISA to molecular-based methods such as RT-PCR and RT-LAMP have been developed over the years. Although ELISA-based methods have good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, molecular detection methods have the advantage of higher analytical sensitivity for the detection of minimal viral RNA.
口蹄疫的现代诊断方法(综述)
口蹄疫现代诊断方法(PCR、ELISA)的发展、改进和应用。研究和讨论的结果。一般来说,可以根据观察到的临床症状来确定口蹄疫疑似病例。然而,基于临床症状的诊断是非常不可靠的,因为其他一些疾病也有与口蹄疫相似的症状,包括猪水疱病(SVD)、水疱性口炎和水疱性皮疹。猪易患水疱性口炎、SVD和口蹄疫,而牛易患水疱性口炎和口蹄疫,均无法根据临床症状进行区分。补体固定试验(CFT)、病毒分离试验、病毒中和试验(VNT)和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)等常规技术是检测临床样品中FMDV的常用方法。分子技术的进步通过检测病毒RNA加速了FMDV的快速准确诊断。本文综述了逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和rt -环介导的等温扩增(RT-LAMP)方法的最新进展。最后,还讨论了侧流免疫层析(LFI)试纸条在FMDV诊断中的作用。结论及进一步研究的展望。各种诊断方法,从传统的病毒分离和竞争抗原和阻断抗原ELISA到基于分子的方法,如RT-PCR和RT-LAMP,已经开发了多年。虽然基于elisa的方法具有良好的诊断敏感性和特异性,但分子检测方法在检测微量病毒RNA时具有较高的分析灵敏度的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信