Comparison of Enhanced Isolation Forest and Enhanced Local Outlier Factor in Anomalous Power Consumption Labelling

Rawan ELhadad, Yi-Fei Tan, W. Tan
{"title":"Comparison of Enhanced Isolation Forest and Enhanced Local Outlier Factor in Anomalous Power Consumption Labelling","authors":"Rawan ELhadad, Yi-Fei Tan, W. Tan","doi":"10.1109/ICPEA56918.2023.10093186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anomaly detection in power consumption is one of the major challenges faced by the modern world in response to the excessive electric consumption in developing countries. As a result, researchers were motivated to conduct extensive studies in this area to develop algorithms that classify the abnormal data instances from smart meter readings. In this paper, we examine and compare the effectiveness of two anomaly labelling algorithms, namely: the Enhanced Isolation Forest (E-IF) and the Enhanced Local Outlier Factor (E-LOF), in detecting the abnormal power consumption in building. The E-IF and the E-LOF are proposed based on the Isolation Forest (IF) and the Local Outlier Factor (LOF) algorithms with an additional step of applying a threshold to distinguish the high and low electricity consumptions anomalies. Experiments were performed to 10 smart meters readings and the capabilities of E-IF and E-LOF in detecting the injected anomalies were investigated. The results showed that the E-IF outperformed E-LOF, with E-IF managed to detect 100% of the injected anomalies at contamination levels of 0.30 and 0.35. The E-LOF, on the other hand, could detect an average of 68% of the injected anomalies for contamination level of 0.30 and 78% for contamination level of 0.35.","PeriodicalId":297829,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference in Power Engineering Applications (ICPEA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference in Power Engineering Applications (ICPEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEA56918.2023.10093186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anomaly detection in power consumption is one of the major challenges faced by the modern world in response to the excessive electric consumption in developing countries. As a result, researchers were motivated to conduct extensive studies in this area to develop algorithms that classify the abnormal data instances from smart meter readings. In this paper, we examine and compare the effectiveness of two anomaly labelling algorithms, namely: the Enhanced Isolation Forest (E-IF) and the Enhanced Local Outlier Factor (E-LOF), in detecting the abnormal power consumption in building. The E-IF and the E-LOF are proposed based on the Isolation Forest (IF) and the Local Outlier Factor (LOF) algorithms with an additional step of applying a threshold to distinguish the high and low electricity consumptions anomalies. Experiments were performed to 10 smart meters readings and the capabilities of E-IF and E-LOF in detecting the injected anomalies were investigated. The results showed that the E-IF outperformed E-LOF, with E-IF managed to detect 100% of the injected anomalies at contamination levels of 0.30 and 0.35. The E-LOF, on the other hand, could detect an average of 68% of the injected anomalies for contamination level of 0.30 and 78% for contamination level of 0.35.
增强型隔离林与增强型局部离群因子在异常电耗标识中的比较
电力消耗异常检测是当今世界面临的主要挑战之一,以应对发展中国家的过度电力消耗。因此,研究人员被激励在这一领域进行广泛的研究,以开发算法,从智能电表读数中分类异常数据实例。在本文中,我们检验和比较了两种异常标记算法,即增强隔离森林(E-IF)和增强局部离群因子(E-LOF),在检测建筑物异常功耗方面的有效性。在隔离森林(IF)和局部离群因子(LOF)算法的基础上,提出了E-IF和E-LOF算法,并增加了应用阈值来区分高、低功耗异常的步骤。对10个智能电表读数进行了实验,并研究了E-IF和E-LOF检测注入异常的能力。结果表明,E-IF优于E-LOF,在污染水平为0.30和0.35时,E-IF能够100%检测到注入的异常。另一方面,当污染水平为0.30时,E-LOF平均能检测出68%的注射异常,当污染水平为0.35时,平均能检测出78%的注射异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信